The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Eversheds wins first EAT religious discrimination hearing" />Eversheds has won the first-ever Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) hearing on religious discrimination, nearly three years after new laws first came into force.
Associate Rehan Akram acted for West Coast Trains, the employers of Mohsin Mohmed, a Muslim man who claimed he was dismissed from his job because of his beard and had therefore suffered religious discrimination.
Mohmed's case was heard by an employment tribunal in 2004, which dismissed the claim. He appealed and the EAT heard the case on 30 June this year, with judgment handed down last week (30 August).
The EAT found that West Coast Trains had not discriminated against Mohmed because of his beard, but had instead dismissed him due to "lack of enthusiasm". This is despite the "beard issue" recurring several times during the months that Mohmed was employed at Euston Station as a customer services assistant.
The company had agreed that Mohmed's beard, worn for religious reasons, was permissible if kept neatly trimmed and at a fist's length.
Eversheds' Akram instructed Old Square Chambers' Jennifer Eady. Claire McCann of Cloisters was instructed by Richard Leong of the London Discrimination Unit for Mohmed.