The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Eversheds has won a crucial IP dispute for chemicals company Dupont against packaging giant Smurfit.
The case went to the Court of Appeal after Smurfit initially claimed that Dupont's wine box taps infringed its patent. Smurfit threatened to take legal action against Dupont customer and wine supplier Constellation Brands.
Dupont went to the High Court to get a declaration that its wine tap did not infringe Smurfit's patent. Smurfit appealed that judgment, but the Court of Appeal has now dismissed the claim.
IP partner Antony Gold led the Eversheds team, which included associates Kate Ellis and Birgit Schluckebier.
Gold said: "Smurfit appealed the High Court judgment on the grounds that it felt Dupont did infringe the patent. The Court of Appeal, very convincingly, said the appeal was unjustified.
"It was a very important case for both parties, but there wasn't a legal principle at stake."
Although Gold did not say how he won the instruction, Eversheds is Dupont's main law firm in England. For the patent case, the firm instructed Daniel Alexander QC at 8 New Square and Piers Acland at 11 South Square.
Nabarro partner Jonathan Radcliffe acted for Smurfit, instructing Michael Silverleaf QC at 11 South Square and Adrian Speck at 8 New Square.
The legal action does not end with the patent decision. Dupont will now seek damages from Smurfit for losses incurred from threats to Constellation and its customers.