Up to 166 jobs are at risk across Eversheds’ UK and Asia offices, with the firm’s Copenhagen office set to disappear altogether, as the firm seeks to realign itself under its new strategy.

Lee Ranson
According to the firm, 82 lawyers and 84 non-lawyers are at risk of losing their jobs following the announcement of the redundancy consultation. An Eversheds source said that the firm would offer enhanced redundancy packages – understood to be double the statutory requirement - to those who lose their jobs.
As part of the changes global managing partner Lee Ranson will become interim Asia managing partner, replacing Nick Seddon, who will leave the firm. According to the firm this is part of its strategy to drive closer integration between Eversheds’ Asia offices and the rest of the business. Other management changes are also expected in Asia.
The firm is also looking to close its Copenhagen office, which is part of the UK LLP, after deciding that there is not enough client interest to keep it open. Eversheds said it is in talks with another firm about forming a relationship and possibly transferring some of its staff.
In the UK, Eversheds’ marketing, IT and facilities teams will be cut down, and lawyers in the real estate and company commercial practices also face the axe.
The consultation period began today. A statement from the firm said: “Alternatives to redundancy will be considered wherever possible, including both redeployment and relocation within the business together with opportunities within Eversheds AGILE.”
Chief executive Bryan Hughes revealed his new three-year plan for the firm at a partner meeting in June 2012 (9 July 2012).
Between 2008 and 2009 Eversheds completed four separate redundancy rounds with some 735 staff losing their jobs (10 September 2009). At the time the firm offered departing employees only the statutory minimum redundancy package, which was one week’s salary for every year worked, providing the employee had been with the firm for at least two years. The cuts had a large effect on morale at Eversheds and the firm attracted a lot of criticism for offering only the statutory minimum.
In a recent interview with The Lawyer Hughes said of the 2009 redundancies: “As with many law firms at the time, redundancies were new to us. When we met with our assessor from Investors in People he said one of the problems we had was that morale was so strong beforehand the firm had further to fall than most. I had to spend a lot of time getting people back onside and part of the morale problem was that we needed to get people busy again.
“You don’t have to make unpopular decisions [to be a law firm manager] but you do have to make the right decisions. I’m in the role to protect and sustain the business. If you can’t make difficult decisions you shouldn’t be in the job.”
Eversheds also cut 75 back-office roles in 2011 (26 May 2011) as a result of an outsourcing deal with Accenture that led to human resources and financial services staff across the firm’s regional UK offices losing their jobs.
For a video interview with Hughes, click here.
Readers' comments (24)
Ever shedding | 24-Jan-2013 12:02 pm
I think this is just the start of another wave of big scale redundancies in big international firms. 2009 all over again!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 12:02 pm
Impeccable timing with The Lawyer's front page feature this week. Maybe Bryan is reaching for a clutch of P45s in the picture?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 12:11 pm
Not about cats, didn't read.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Fran Shaefer | 24-Jan-2013 12:44 pm
seems in line with the rest of the industry
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 12:59 pm
I heard good package though !!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 1:20 pm
Most of the people I talk to in law firms (senior and junior) seem upbeat about their firms and business generally, certainly when compared to the last few years. This seems to be at odds with all these redundancy stories. Why the disconnect?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 2:42 pm
A difficult day at Eversheds, however in the long run this will make the firm stronger.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 6:13 pm
This latest batch of redundancies sits very uncomfortably with the fact that PEP increased by over 10% (£50k) just a few months ago. Eversheds are clearly not struggling and this latest move seems yet another stunt to line the pockets of those who already earn unjustified amounts for the actual amount of work they do!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
T-bone | 24-Jan-2013 6:21 pm
@1:20pm
Easy, the people you are talking to are focused on chargeable hours/workload. Redundancy decisions are being made by people focused on profit. There’s a lot of downward fee pressure and just because people are busy, it doesn’t mean that the income reflects that to a level satisfactory to the equity partners calling the shots.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 24-Jan-2013 8:57 pm
The interview with Hughes earlier this week mentions PEP was up last financial year and profits per lawyer have doubled since 2004. So this frankly smacks of pure greed and protectionism of partner's profits at the expense of the rest of the firm.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment