The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Eversheds has been fined £3,000 plus £3,127 costs on two counts of making late payments into its company pension scheme.
EIW Services (North East), the law firm's Newcastle-based employment services company, pleaded guilty to eight charges of late payment. The charges were brought by the Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority (Opra) at Newcastle-upon-Tyne magistrates court on Friday (24 September).
John Hayes, chairman of Opra, says: "A pension law firm has the least excuse. We need to make sure that its own people know what the law is.
"We felt a firm of lawyers who themselves advise on pensions have no reason not to be prosecuted."
The company was fined £1,500 for two late payments in 1997 and was granted absolute discharge on six other charges. The firm had faced a maximum fine of £5,000 for each criminal charge.
The charges were brought after the company failed to pay employee contributions to the trustees of two pension schemes within the 19 day limit set out in the Pensions Act 1995 (The Lawyer, 5 July).
The pension scheme was previously run by Wilkinson Maughan which merged with Eversheds in 1997. However, since the merger, the scheme has been run by the firm's employment services company EIW Services.
According to a statement issued by the firm: "Eversheds is the first to acknowledge that non-compliance of this nature is inexcusable."
It also states that none of the firm's specialist pension lawyers were involved in any of the administrative matters.
It adds: "In the judgment the following points were taken into account: an early guilty plea; full co-operation with Opra; all necessary steps had been taken to put right the administrative errors; and there was no loss to any of the pension funds."