Eversheds heads effort to increase diversity

  • Print
  • Comments (13)

Readers' comments (13)

  • If law firms keep looking for students who have done well at school from the age of 5, they will not end up with much diversity. It is after all only a certain type of person who was that focused on their career as a child!

    Also, a girl from a minority ethnic community might not have received any encouragement at all, when she was a child, to pursue a career. Accordingly, she may not have excelled at school. That does not mean she would not make a great lawyer - on the contrary.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Its very very very easy for firms to pay lip service to diversity and that's all most of them do. I'd like to think that this time will be different but history speaks for itself....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is worth noting that past editorials of Eversheds and its diversity proposals and achievements have not mentioned anything about disabled students/trainees/solicitors but has been more focussed on ethnic diversity achievements. Once again disability is the FORGOTTEN and IGNORED aspect of diversity. WHEN are firms going to consider disabled people??
    Katherine Everard (past Chairperson of Law Society Group for Solicitors with Disabilities - now LDD)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'm a little confused by this- at my firm there is no shortage of lawyers of Asian and "Oriental" descent.

    Plenty of diversity already from where I'm standing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What a joke - considering the first to be axed from the Eversheds Leeds Property in the phase 1 of redundancies were the only 2 non-white lawyers!!!!!!!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having worked in private practice for almost 10 years, I honestly do not believe for a second that there is any discrimination within law firms on the grounds of skin colour.

    I do not know a single one of my colleagues who would make any distinction between a black/white/asian candidate at an interview.

    I think the real "diversity" problem is not so much race, as it is social class. There are several black lawyers in my department (City firm), but they mostly come from the quintissential privileged background- private school all their life, followed by a top uni.

    The truth is, that it certainly makes it more difficult for those who haven't come from such a background (educated parents, private school etc) to feel at home in a City law firm.

    Distinguishing on the basis of ethnic background/skin colour however, and trying to increase the amount of people from ethnic minorities in law firms is totally the wrong way to go about things.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brian, how do you arrive at the conclusion that blacks and others who come from underprivileged backgrounds wont feel at home in a city firm? It is this stereotypical attitude by city firms that underprivileged background means you are not good enough for city which needs change. I feel insulted when people have opinions about people they have never given a chance.
    This initiative is just a deliberate ploy by the city to be seen to be doing something.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Does any of this debate consider opportunities for those with disabilities? i assume not!!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I am an unemployed minority attorney from the United States. I did attend private school, and I possess a law degree from a top American and French law school. I speak and write French fluently, and I speak some Spanish.

    Lawyers and judges alike have said that I am an excellent lawyer. I'm married and stable. What's the problem now? Now I'm told that, after accomplishing all that, I'm too old and too expensive.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Brian is right. Diversity is a laudable objective, but firms should hire the best qualified candidate - in an insanely competitive market and sky high fee rates clients deserve the best service possible, and it should come from the best lawyer without reference to race, creed, sex or other. This initiative sounds like a filter which will inappropriately exclude qualified candidates on precisely the grounds it purports to be championing.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (13)