The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A European Court of Justice (ECJ) opinion handed down this morning (7 April) has found that UK tax law is incompatible with European Community law.
Advocate General Poiares Maduro gave his opinion in the case of Marks & Spencer v Halsey, finding that the retailer should be allowed to offset losses made in Europe through its UK operation.
The Inland Revenue – through tax inspector David Halsey – had argued that its group relief scheme, enabling a parent company to offset the losses made by subsidiaries, did not apply where those subsidiaries were based abroad. In the ECJ hearing the Revenue was supported by representations from Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden.
But the Advocate General said that this rule is incompatible with European legislation. His opinion will now guide the decision of ECJ judges, whose judgment is awaited.
Marks & Spencer’s (M&S) case is the first major European victory in a series of tax cases referred to the ECJ by UK courts. Dorsey & Whitney partner Simon Whitehead, instructing Graham Aaronson QC of Pump Court Tax Chambers, acted for M&S and the firm is also leading the Loss Relief Group Litigation currently proceeding through the High Court.
Richard Plender QC of 20 Essex Street was instructed by the Inland Revenue.