DWF Eversheds DWF reports 84 per cent growth to £188m By Hannah Gannage-Stewart 6 June 2013 10:06 17 December 2015 13:06 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 10:27 Turnover up 84% Net profit up 41% Profit per partner up 4% Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 10:55 turnover up 84%. Wow. net profit up up 41.3%. Wow. PEP up, erm, 4% to £429k. So the partners go a bit of above an inflationary pay rise. Wonder how much of that increase in profit/PEP came from increase in WIP and therefore accrued income year on year? Bet the silver circle boys are really worried….. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 11:53 Net margin down from a worrying 14.2% to a frightening 10.9%. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 12:39 An extra £86 million in turnover gives each partner an extra £17,000 in income. So, on this basis, if they want an extra £170,000 each, they’ve got to increase turnover by £860 million. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 13:11 Wow! 84%. Stunning. Well done to all those involved. I note the grumbles about the PEP, but isn’t this expected? Don’t shareholders usually wait until the growth to stabilise until before they take huge dividends? Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 13:19 DWF marketing/ social media team are pretty slow off the mark today. Not a single post (yet) dismissing the neysayers as jealous…. Probably too busy giving Gerard Starkey at legal week a nice little exclusive briefing in more detail about their expansion plans as they “refuse to stand still”….. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 13:22 Andrew Leaitherland is a genius. He’s taken a small firm into the big time. With success, come the critics. I’d be interested to see how much turnover has risen in the Newcastle office (since they corrected the mistake of appointing John Flynn as office manager). Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 14:01 Anonymous @ 1:19: You jinxed it, now they’re everywhere (1:22 and 1:11) Reply Link vanity and sanity 6 June 2013 at 14:05 How much money have the partners had to put in to fund the growth? Is all of that worry worth 17k especially as those numbers will likely fall back next year but the firm’s capital requirements will stay the same or possibly increase. Frightening stuff. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 14:21 Anonymous at 1.11 needs to learn the difference between profit and drawings. Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 14:23 Anon 2:01 Read comment 1.22 again. I hardly think DWF’s marketing team are going to want to highlight DWF’s biggest management blunder of the last five years! Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 14:50 The comments regarding margin and profit are interesting, but this is on the face of it a good performance. Job losses are to be expected after consolidation and will be only one of the integration challanges faced. Would be interesting to know how the 84% growth is broken down – is it just the sum total of all of the individual firms being counted as one, rather than sepeately? – or – has the combined firm increased turnover, with the sum total being more than the individual parts? Will be interesting to see how the next year develops and how successful the integration is. Good luck to them. Reply Link Lawyer 2 Banker 6 June 2013 at 15:50 Yet another law firm, not “getting it” , nor having a proper handle on the crucial numbers. Turnover for vanity, profits for….. The margins , are tight to put it mildly. They are only going to get worse, by reason of the fact DWF, have a large “churn em and burn em” defendant PI practice. Awful rates, made worse by the MOJ reforms , which will result in them being instructed to defend, possibly as much as 50% less litigated cases, than they were before, given Portal Increases and the likely increase in the small claims court threshold. Moreover , with such thin margins, all it takes is for a profitable team(s) within the firm to go to leave and join a PROPER top 20 firm, for those margins then beginning to look more worryingly than one can possibly imagine. Once all these mergers have bedded down, and the full acquisition cost been made known in H1 of their next years accounts, you can be assured that these figures will fall, ( that is the figures that matter) And Mr Leitherland the figure is “GENUINE PROFIT” These acquisitions are funded by a large and ever growing tranche of debt. Halliwells anyone! ? Given the cultural sensitivities in all these mergers, egos, and equity being held tightly, there will be teams leaving in droves in the next 12/24 months, of that you can be rest assured! In closing all that increase in turnover is almost certainly merger derived and not organic. Anyone can do that. As the poster above quite properly said, all that hassle for an extra £17,000 extra per EP! Mr Leaitherland is a genius… I doubt it , however time will tell. Now watch out DLA, DWF, are coming at ya! (reverse take over!) Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 17:01 I always assumed that when the numbers went up, that was good. Reply Link Michael 6 June 2013 at 18:57 In response to Anon’s post at 5.01. Not necessarily , the numbers need to be considered in context! When debt grows is that good!? Reply Link Anonymous 6 June 2013 at 22:28 Gray going straight from Eversheds to DWF must have gone down really well with Eversheds senior partner Brian Hughes. Hee hee. Reply Link Anonymous 7 June 2013 at 09:15 Normally, when there’s been a merger, you do like-like figures. Anyone want to gather up Cobbetts, Biggart Baillie and Fishburns results from last year and add them onto that £102m and £14.5m so the comparison is like-like? Reply Link Anonymous 7 June 2013 at 15:42 According to the figures here: http://www.thelawyer.com/news-and-analysis/market-analysis/analysis-on-dwf-self-assembly-or-the-diy-law-firm/3001962.article £188 million represents no non-merger growth at all. Reply Link Anonymous 13 August 2013 at 13:45 Have the trainee retention figures for DWF (and I guess Cobbetts) been published? Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.