Manchester headquartered DWF and Scotland’s Biggart Baillie have confirmed that they will merge to create a near £120m firm.

Andrew Leaitherland
Talk about a potential merger between DWF and Biggart Baillie had been in the market for a number of months, according to sources in Scotland, but this intensified in recent weeks.
Following a story on TheLawyer.com, the two firms issued a statement confirming that they plan to merge on 1 July. It is not yet known what the merged firm will be called.
In a statement DWF managing partner Andrew Leaitherland said: “We have ambitious growth plans and are always looking for ways to enhance our offering for clients and strengthen our UK-wide presence.
“Similarly, Biggart Baillie was keen to continue to expand and provide increased services for its growing client base outside of Scotland. For a merger like this to truly succeed, it’s essential that you link with like-minded businesses, and Biggart Baillie’s values-driven approach and commitment to growth is a perfect fit with DWF.”
Biggart Baillie managing partner Alasdair Peacock added: “These are exciting times in a rapidly changing legal market. Competition is fierce and this merger will enhance our ability to continue to compete at the top end of the market on quality and sector expertise.
“DWF’s remarkable growth story is an obvious attraction and we’re delighted to be part of that. The cultural fit is strong and our clients operating in Scotland and England will benefit from increased strength in depth, and also geographical coverage.”
The firm will initially be branded as DWF Biggart Baillie in Scotland and will remain DWF elsewhere. It is not clear whether ’Biggart Baillie’ will eventualy be dropped from the Scottish arm’s name.
The merged firm will have a combined turnover of around £118.2m, based on DWF’s 2011-12 turnover and Biggart Baillie’s 2010-11 turnover. The combined firm will also have around 166 partners in 12 offices across London, the Midlands, the north of England and Scotland.
DWF’s turnover rose 23 per cent in 2011-12, from £83m to £102m, according to the firm (1 June 2012). Average profit per equity partner (PEP) also grew, rising seven per cent from £388,000 to £415,000 over the same period.
The firm has had an acquisitive 12 months, launching in Birmingham in July 2011 (28 July 2011), taking over Newcastle firm Crutes in January 2012 (25 November 2011), and bolting on Birmingham and Coventry firm Buller Jeffries in April 2012 (2 April 2012). DWF also came close to securing a merger with fellow Manchester firm Cobbetts, but talks fell through with both parties citing market difficulties for the collapse (31 January 2012).
Biggart Baillie has not yet posted its results for 2011-12, but in 2010-11 the firm had a stable year, posting revenue of £16.2m. In that year the firm became more profitable, with average PEP rising 25 per cent to £171,000. This growth was down to disposing of surplus property and aggressively managing supplier costs, according to the firm.
Scotland’s legal market has experienced rapid consolidation this year, with firms looking to tie up with practices based in England.
Earlier this year Scottish firm McGrigors and Pinsent Masons merged, creating a £282m firm with over 1,500 lawyers (6 February 2012). In March, DAC Beachcroft revealed that it was taking over Andersons and two months later Bristol’s TLT announced that it was going to merge with Anderson Fyfe (9 May 2012).
There have also been numerous failed mergers that have made the news. In October 2011, Bircham Dyson Bell and Dundas & Wilson pulled out of merger talks (10 October 2011) while in March this year it was revealed that Bond Pearce and Maclay Murray & Spens had called off merger discussions for commercial reasons (14 March 2012).
Readers' comments (21)
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 12:49 pm
It feels like 2am at a teen disco. Every firm is pairing off, apart from the ones that nobody wants to partner with.
I feel a bit sorry for them.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 1:07 pm
I'm surprised that more firms aren't proactively seeking strategic mergers. For example, Shoosmiths is a lower middle tier firm with good coverage in the South and Midlands. Acquiring their respective firm in the North, probably Dickinson Dees or Cobbetts, would make perfect sense.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 1:24 pm
Have they sorted the domain name?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anon | 7-Jun-2012 1:33 pm
Great fit. The combined firm will need a lot more mergers however, and to start thinking about international growth too....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 1:58 pm
If you're the senior partner and you go looking for a merger, there's a 50% chance you won't have a job in a few months time.
If you're an older under-performing equity partner then entering into merger negotiations means that your poor record will be openly discussed.
However if you're a young buck, then you'll be hungry to be part of a bigger, better and more competitive organisation.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 2:25 pm
I think the domain name is already registered. It's www.shoosmiths.co.uk
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 7-Jun-2012 3:13 pm
Pairing off at 2am at the teen disco rarely created long term happy relationships.....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Coming out of the darkness | 7-Jun-2012 5:09 pm
If you left it until 2am you had no chance, that's when the lights come on. I always made my move at 1.50am and had a formidable strike rate even if most of them looked liked DWF's managing partner - I like a big blonde I do.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
TheLawMap Associate | 7-Jun-2012 5:11 pm
Mergers are the only way to survive in this climate for medium to large sized firms. If Dewey can fall, admittedly the management practises were awful there, I think alarm bells should ring. A number of firms are looking at international partnerships as well which seems like a good idea.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
stating the obvious | 7-Jun-2012 5:28 pm
"It is not clear whether ’Biggart Baillie’ will eventualy be dropped from the Scottish arm’s name."
It will be once the clients are used to seeing 'DWF' at the start of everything and the 'DWF Biggart Baillie' stationary runs out.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment