The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Can I correct a point in Roger Pearson's article (28 November) on the Fairey case? CPAG acts for Rebecca Halliday.
The article says the ruling entitles Rebecca (who is profoundly deaf) to payment for an interpreter, including for social purposes. That is not accurate.
Disability living allowance (DLA) is paid to severely disabled people with care needs. The question the Court of Appeal had to decide was whether, in determining if a claimant suffers from the requisite disability level, one could take into account help s/he needs in all aspects of normal, everyday life - including a reasonable amount of social activities - or only help for what might be termed strictly medical purposes. The Court of Appeal adopted the broad approach.
If Rebecca eventually gets benefit - the case is going to the Lords - she will be paid at the flat rate of £31.20 per week. How she spends the money will be up to her.
We hope the Lords will support the Court of Appeal's enlightened approach. Government policy these days is to help disabled people live full lives in the community. It is somewhat surprising, therefore, that its parsimonious approach makes it difficult for people such as Rebecca to do so.