Categories:Australasia

DLA targets Asia Pacific growth via merger with Aussie best friend

  • Print
  • Comments (23)

Readers' comments (23)

  • @Anonymous | 27-Jan-2011 4:57 pm

    Oh yes those pooooor DLA lawyers only earning a mere £150K per year. How on earth does anyone survive in London on less than half a million?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another McDonalds in a different country...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It should be voted down

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • To all the snipers on here: keep sneering at DLA, and keep being complacent.

    You are getting left further and further behind in terms of scale and are steadily losing control of your own destiny. Soon you will have only two options left: merge, or die. Hopefully it will be the latter.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Stephen Pipes
    Yes, I imagine Nigel Boardman is bricking himself about this development.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • to @Vercingetorix at 2.43PM
    I'm sure too that Nigel Boardman and all at S&M are not worried at all about DLA. But, not everyone is Slaughters - in fact, in the UK no other firm is like S&M at all - and that's the problem with your argument.
    But, there are a couple of dozen top 50 law firms in the UK that really are getting left behind in terms of global capability to whom such competition may soon matter.
    OK, yes, DLA are no magic circle firm, but so what? They're doing alright and still will be some years in the future. As for many others between the UK Top 50 to silver circle rank, I'm really not so sure.
    Last time I checked most major clients were increasing their investments abroad. You can follow them, or sit on your hands and wait to see what happens.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @ Vercingetorix - I would be very surprised if even Slaughter and May were not aware of the dangers of becoming too sub-scale.
    At present Slaughter and May is around a third the size of the largest firm in terms of total revenues, not a great problem in view of their very high profit margins. However if the largest firm was a twentieth the size then that would be a grave threat.
    The process of globalisation and consolidation in the legal market has a long way to go, and the Chinese are only just begin to enter the market. In ten years' time things will look dramatically different.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Comparing S&M with DLA is like comparing Fat Duck with McDonalds. They are both selling food & drinks and McDonalds has a much larger turnover. So, surely, McDonalds must be the better place to eat!
    I normally don't comment on things like these, but I just finished commenting on a DLA draft agreement. I am uncertain as to whether the lawyer who did the draft has an IQ of over 100. And yes, there are very good DLA lawyers and I know a few. But a draft of this quality would not have left a MC firm under any circumstances.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gourmet

    I work at a MC firm and I can tell you that even here poor documents do get sent out (unfortunately) and I certainly get them from other MC firms as well! To suggest this does not happen is completely untrue!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Having worked at DLA Phillips Fox for many years, I know first hand the bad management the firm continues to show. It's financials are terrible - that's the real truth about why DLA PF's NZ office isn't included in the deal. DLA PF have a strong reputation for not maintaining their staff. Recently an employee filed proceedings against DLA PF and some 30 former staff were willing to appear as witnesses.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (23)