DLA Piper confirms move to all-equity model By Matt Byrne 20 October 2011 09:53 17 December 2015 14:20 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Boxer 20 October 2011 at 10:17 Am I alone in feeling sceptical about this? It seems a strange move against the current tide. Reply Link Anonymous 20 October 2011 at 12:10 It’s a clever move that will shake up the market. DLA Piper has made a series of excellent decisions over the last few years. This is driven by ABS. More than at any time, there is a need to attract the best talent. All firms are at a junction, DLA has firmly decided to offer high level specialist advice. Imagine you’re the best performing partner in a broad based firm like Burges Salmon or Dickinson Dees. You know that ABS is likely to decimate your traditional markets and your firm will need to restructure. Therefore you can either get paid less for the next few years or you can move to a firm where your input will directly translate into profits. Of course DLA have to pick the right people. However I imagine that most partners in the big mid-level regional firms would jump at this chance before the market changes. Reply Link Anonymous 20 October 2011 at 16:16 The smartest guys in the room. In almost every other firm across the United Kingdom the elder partners are using the poor market conditions as an excuse to give themselves a higher percentage of the profits. DLA Piper have done the opposite. They’ve sent a message out that young over achieving partners should defect. It’s a great strategy and I dare say it’ll attract the best young talent. Personally it’s not for me. I imagine the demands to perform exceptionally year in, year out will be crazy. However I guess DLA Piper want the most ambitious new partners. Reply Link Anonymous 20 October 2011 at 18:09 I am little puzzled by this announcement and wonder how much it will actually change the reality for the current fixed share partners. To my knowledge, DLA (outside the US) introduced a sliding scale of capital contributions for fixed share partners as long ago as 2007, such that a senior fixed share partner on £200,000 was required to contribute £40,000 in capital. That was a substantial contribution for a non-equity partner and it may be much higher today. I suppose it is no bad thing that such contributions could now translate into a bigger share in the profits and a greater say in how the firm is managed. Reply Link Anonymous 21 October 2011 at 13:00 Congratulations to the DLA marketing team’s comments below! Everyone knows there is equity and there is equity! A number of firms are all equity partnership and lets just say equity certainly doesnt mean fairness.There are those at the top and those at the bottom. The difference between the all equity and the more traditional model is that everyone in the former have to contribute capital – the traditional model allows individuals to be sure that they want to invest capital into the business first. I think the all equity model is a marketers dream – making out that everyone is equal – just ask anyone in an all equity firm!! Fundamentally DLA is an awesome business and doesnt have to use “smoke and mirrors” like this. Reply Link Anonymous 21 October 2011 at 14:17 I posted the comment at 20-Oct-2011 4:16 pm. I can assure you I’m not a DLA employee. However right now I’m also very glad I’m not an employee at a mid-tier firm about to be shaken up by ABS. Reply Link Simon 25 October 2011 at 16:50 Partners should beware of Greeks bearing gifts. No doubt those higher up the equity tree will be lining their pockets at the expense of everyone else. there may be those with doubts, but like at the old Politburo, the vote will be unamimous. Reply Link anonymouse 26 October 2011 at 10:48 someone above wrote about a hypothetical senior fixed share partner making 200k – well, that is quite bizarre. No “senior fixed share” partner would be making that wage – that’s what senior associates make at many firms. Senior fixed share partners average more than double that amount, which means that the equity contribution estimate of 50m is way low. For an average partner making 700k a year (which is less than DLA’s reported PPP figure), the equity contribution will be closer to 300k. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.