Dickinson Dees and Bond Pearce in talks to create £92m firm

  • Print
  • Comments (53)

Readers' comments (53)

  • if the grass is so much greener why are you still so interested in DD....get over it...move on...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have worked at Dickinson Dees for 12 years. In fact this is a second career for me having worked in fund management and the financial services - a very tough working environment which focuses on results and the "bottom line". However, it is not a "bitchy" industry. There are a number of comments on this blog which are really "catty" - is it so impossible to post constructive professional comments?

    One of the things that impresses me about Dickinson Dees (amongst others) is the leadership of the firm to be found in John Marshall and Jonathan Blair. On a personal level they have genuine integrity and are extremely approachable and personable. On a commerial level they have strong business acumen, i.e. in a fast consolidating market they have a great sense of direction and focus.

    The proposed merger opens up so many future business possibilties for both firms. I and many others at Dickinson Dees feel very positive about it. My view is not untypical of the majority of people working at Dickinson Dees.

    For those who have left Dickinson Dees and have found the grass to be greener, then I am very happy for you and wish you all the luck in the world but the grass on this side of the fence is not just green it is very verdent!

    For the avoidance of any doubt I don't work in the PR/Marketing team. I am a fee earner who enjoys working in a firm which has direction and wants to genuinely engage with its employees.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Glad to hear the grass is now verdant! When I left it was mottled brown.

    Can I offer a measured counter-point about staff being excited. I had lunch on the Quayside a couple of hours ago and the Dickie Dees staff talking on the table next to us were saying they were disappointed to be linked to such an anonymous firm. Perhaps that isn't representative, but that was also my first thought when I heard.

    It always amuses me how many comments any article on Dickie Dees creates. They seem to polarise opinion. They're certainly not anonymous!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Anonymous 2.35pm:-

    Presumably you mean 'verdant'?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • WOW! There certainly is a lot of bitterness about Dickinson Dees. I left Dickinson Dees a few years ago for a local competitor. That said I would have to say that I really enjoyed my time at Dickinson Dees. They are a genuine employee focused employer. They have a unique ability to identify employees' strengths and encourage and support individual growth. You are not simply a number!

    On the bigger picture they have a strong management team supported at all levels, thus ensuring a balanced approach to any matter. This approach is borne out by the clear symmetry between the two firms in the proposed merger. A clear strategy would appear to have been adopted which will help both firms merge seamlessly whilst allowing a streamlined approach to the legal market post merger. I am sure they will be successful and I wish them well in the future.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This amazing merger will create one of the world's leading law firms. The calibre of BPD's lawyers will astound even the most cynical observer and cement a legal dynasty that will last 10,000 years. Emperors Tettmar and Blair shall unite earth's disparate communities and, after the people clamour for it to be so, time shall henceforth be spoken of in terms of pre-BPD and post-BPD. In this utopia, only the marketing teams shall be permitted to give views on legal news and all staff shall celebrate that the concept of being promotion to partner was expunged from all records / language from November 2012 onwards. Hail BPD.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 4/10 for strategy and ambition. Both firms should have lined up a better merger partner last year. Neither firm is terrible nor is the merger, but they're at different ends of the country. A tie up with a Shoosmiths, Cobbetts or even Eversheds would have been better. Hopefully it'll work though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have no reason to like Dickie Dees, but I would like to champion the work of Jonathan Blair and John Marshall.

    They took office in my final months at the firm and were a breath of fresh air. Although they have different styles, both are very impressive.

    The last few years have seen steady progress from Dickie Dees. I suspect that this management team have had to correct a lot of long-standing problems. Having put this groundwork in, it appears to me that Dickie Dees are now in a position to push forward up the rankings.

    I suspect that Bristol is in the lead to become the HQ of the new firm. However I hope that Bond Pearce recognise the contribution that these two can make in the future and retain them in important roles.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A lot of negative comments on this one. Honestly, I do think it could work. Firms need bench strength in key areas, and a merger of the two may provide it.

    I know a few people at Bond Pearce in junior roles fed up with the office politics (favouritism and lack of meritocracy being frequent, albeit unoriginal, complaints). Marshall and Blair seem quite highly thought of and it will be interesting to see if they can change this.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Blair and Marshall are lovely fellows. However they seem powerless to resolve the favourtism and lack of meritocracy that plagues Dickie Dees. If that's also a problem at Bond Pearce, I can't see this ending well. Sorry. I just can't.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (53)