Caroline Binham
Dewey Ballantine and LeBoeuf Lamb Greene & MacRae are set to rush through partnership voting on their planned merger just one working day before the combination is due to go live.
Both sides are positive about the merger, which should be effective from 1 October, with one senior-level partner claiming it was “already a done deal”.
He claimed that voting, which is slated to finish on Friday 28 September, was just a formality.
Dewey is adopting a very different timetable with regards to the LeBoeuf deal than it did on last year’s failed merger talks with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe.
Negotiations with Orrick lasted at least six months, but fell apart days before the final partnership vote.
The talks with LeBoeuf have been much speedier, with the idea of a merger between the two New York-headquartered firms having been tabled in July.
The strategy is to push through voting on the merger and to thrash out political issues, such as who will be London managing partner, once the vote has been won.
It is understood that it was these types of management issues that stalled the merger with Orrick.
Dewey London managing partner Fred Gander said: “Both firms in this transaction see the world from a far more similar place than was the case with Orrick. That’s streamlined a lot of issues and enabled us to go at a record pace.”
Readers' comments (6)
Fred Gander, Dewey Ballantine | 18-Sep-2007 6:21 pm
Already partners
It really feels like we are already partners. It’s going to be a big step for us, we’re going to have 200 lawyers in London. That’s really unbelieveable; if I think back to when I first arrived in the UK in 1991, there were only two of us. Even in 1996, there were only five of us. I couldn’t have envisaged having 200 lawyers in London back then!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-Sep-2007 9:25 pm
Tax/structured finance
How will the combined firm stand in the derivatives/structured finance areas, particularly tax? Will they have a US tax presence in London in addition to UK tax? I understand few firms in London have a real expertise in US taxation of these trades, and that clients call NY for answers.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 21-Sep-2007 7:04 pm
Here we go again!
This may look like it is all roses on the surface but it won't be when it gets down to the nitty gritty. Dewey has been a mess for years. It has seen a steady decline. This might be okay for the partners but everyone else will surely suffer.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
UK associate | 25-Sep-2007 11:37 am
Money
Is the newly merged firm going to pay full NY rates to its UK associates?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Sep-2007 3:19 pm
Leboeuf
This has got to be a takeover by LeBoeufs. Dewey Ballantine was in a really weakened state after it didn’t do the deal with Orrick. LeBoeufs has become really aggressive in the past few years under Davis. There’s no way on god’s earth that LeBoeufs would agree to a merger of equals!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Sep-2007 6:21 pm
Dewey - LeBoeuf, merger? Ha!
This is a good thing as it saves Dewey from its continued downward spiral. But a merger? Not a chance. We all know that Mort's key deal breaker point is the continuance of the Dewey name and that is about all he got in this deal. The question is, will LeBoeuf have the guts to slash the amazing number of non producing partners that Dewey has? What about the non functional partners that Dewey London has hired over the last 12 months.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment