Data protection: Latitude
18 March 2011 | By Joanne Harris
31 January 2011
18 March 2011
16 April 2012
27 September 2011
30 July 2012
In 2002 the EU passed a directive governing data protection and privacy online. Widely known as the e-privacy directive but correctly entitled Directive 2002/58 on Privacy and Electronic Communications, this set out a range of provisions requiring service providers to safeguard the security of internet and mobile telephone communication.
It is this aspect of the directive that concerns Melanie Hatton, general counsel for online marketing agency Latitude Digital Marketing. Latitude’s business is all about targeting online marketing to users. Therefore, the future of the legislation will be crucial for the company and how it operates.
In the UK the directive was transposed into law through the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, using the same language as the original EU law. In guidance published in 2006, the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said an uncomplicated, easily understandable approach was important.
Under the changes, article 5(3) reads: “Member states shall ensure that the storing of information, or the gaining of access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment of a subscriber or user is only allowed on condition that the subscriber or user concerned has given his or her consent, having been provided with clear and comprehensive information in accordance with Directive 95/46/EC, inter alia, about the purposes of the processing.”
“As ever, the devil is in the detail, or in this case the lack of it,” says Hatton. “The directive is open to interpretation, in particular in relation to the issue of website operators serving cookies to its visitors to track users’ behaviour.”
In June last year a European Commission working party issued guidance on the changes. Although Hatton welcomes the fact that the revisions’ recitals allow for web browsers to be used to gain consent and also state that the right to refuse should be “as user-friendly as possible”, she notes that the working party interpreted the requirement quite strictly.
“The new law provides regulators with an opportunity to explore how consumers’ privacy is protected at a time when it is already in the spotlight,” she says. “Behavioural advertising and customised pricing practices have been the subject of recent OFT investigations, and there is steadily becoming more publicity about the online ’trade’ in personal data and behavioural patterns in exchange for information. Behavioural advertising is an important tool used by some advertisers in the competitive online world, and some see this new law as a threat to the way they can carry out that advertising.”
Quite what the changes will mean for Latitude is still to be determined. Hatton reveals that the directive initially caused consternation among online advertisers.
Hatton points to recent developments by Firefox and Google to deal with compliance issues through web browsers as an example of how the industry has responded to the problems.
Hatton says Latitude expects the ICO to issue flexible guidance for the new law. “That guidance will, of course, affect the way website operators organise their sites, and the extent to which they have the ability to track users’ behaviour - the availability of that data will of course affect the way in which advertisers can run their campaigns and target potential customers online,” Hatton explains. “It would be a shame if the ability to track behaviour was cut short. That data helps website operators provide users with a helpful and targeted online experience.”
Latitude has been proactive about dealing with the potential issues. Last year the company carried out research with Lancaster University students, to analyse the way they reacted to behavioural advertising.
“We found that the younger generation are much more willing to trade that online profile for relevant and targeted information and also advertisements,” Hatton says.
In order to comply with the new e-privacy directive Latitude will have to juggle the requirements of the law, the way it will ultimately be applied by regulators, and the ever-changing environment of the internet.
Implementation is unlikely to be straightforward, but the legislation will affect not only lawyers but also everyone who uses the internet.