Crash of the Icebergs

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Readers' comments (3)

  • Although this is seen as a success for some it is of no help to ordinary savers in the subsidiary Landsbanki Guernsey (formerly Cheshire Guernsey) who did not benefit from any Government action or from what they see as as very unjust priority ruling by the Icelandic Court.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As a born and bred Guernsey person I feel shame by the lack of help from my Guernsey Government over the Landsbanki Guernsey debacle. I would not advise anyone to invest here again .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The financial muscle of the local authorities has enabled them to afford very expensive legal representation whereas ordinary depositors in Landsbanki Guernsey, where the sums of money involved are tiny in comparison to those claimed by the LAs, have not been entitled to the same representation. So their claims remain ranked as ordinary creditors and the takings commensurately reduced following the success of the LAs action. If one group of people placing a deposit in a bank are given preferential treatment from another merely because that first group have the financial clout to enforce preferred treatment then it is indeed a very sad day for justice. Of course the lawyers in this case will only be representing their clients but surely they should also be pursuing a truth that all depositors who placed money in these Icelandic banks should receive equal treatment. It is not clear to me why the LAs should have preferential treatment, other then that it was not fair for Icelandic depositors to receive preferential treatment over foreign depositors. It is sad that truth and fairness should not be apparent to all interested parties and not require expensive legal actions. Sorry for being naive! Meanwhile I concur that Guernsey's authorities have lacked the moral courage to fight on behalf of Depositors who have been treated more as shareholders in a bankrupt company. A review of the Guernsey Financial Services Commission paid for by the States of Guernsey (which also funds the commission) found no wrongdoing despite the fact that the Parental Guarantee of Landsbanki hf of its Guernsey Subsidiaries deposits was never actually signed and accordingly Landsbanki hf are exempt from this proposed support. Would you put your money into a jurisdiction where there is such a moral vacuum?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)