The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Deference in the courtroom is usually reserved for courteous barristers obsequiously observing the rank of whichever judge happens to be before them. But complacent judges, if Sir Sydney Kentridge QC happens to grace your courtroom, beware.
Making an appearance last week for Sinclair Roche & Temperley in its application for leave to appeal an earlier finding of negligence, Lord Justices Waller and Parker failed to observe the required etiquette. Following several hours of Kentridge's submissions, the pair then endured the horrifying revelation that they had failed to address the courtroom legend correctly, omitting to recognise his knighted status. Credit the pair, though, for promptly moving to correct the situation, with one immediately offering profuse apologies, accepting that the error was particularly unforgivable considering all the years he had known the great man.
Waller and Parker were further embarrassed when, having interrupted Kentridge again to say that the paragraphs they were being referred to contained different text to that read out in court, Kentridge pointed out that they had copies of the draft first instance judgment rather than the one actually handed down. Still no flies on Sir Sydney then.