The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Mr Justice Collins has been criticised by the Court of Appeal for failing to uphold “the preservation of the public confidence in the profession”.
Overturning two of Collins J’s rulings in cases against the General Medical Council (GMC), Lord Justice Chadwick said: “In my judgement the test which [Collins] applied is, with respect, not helpful or adequate.”
Chadwick concluded that “there was not in either of these cases any proper basis established for overturning the sanctions set by the [GMC’s] fitness to practise panel.” Lord Justice Laws and Sir Peter Gibson, also sitting, concurred.
Both cases, Fatnani vs GMC and Raschid vs GMC, related to sanctions imposed by the GMC for professional misconduct.
The GMC was represented by Robert Englehart QC and Ivan Hare of Blackstone Chambers. Fatnani was represented by John Hardy of 3 Raymond Buildings and Raschid appeared in person.
As revealed by The Lawyer (9 October 2006), along with Justices Gloster, Stanley Burton and Sullivan, Collins’ success rate of having appealed verdicts upheld in the Court of Appeal hovers between 50 and 60 per cent. The average High Court judge had around 60 per cent of appealed judgments upheld.