The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Proposed costs management programme derailed at the final hour
Is the senior judiciary rolling back from the costs reform programme proposed by Lord Justice Jackson?
The fact that costs management will no longer be applied to cases valued at above £2m in the chancery is, some litigators believe, a sure sign that it is.
Following a pilot in the Birmingham Technology and Construction Court (TCC) and Mercantile Court, the costs management programme should have been fully implemented by 1 April, with the exception of the Commercial Court.
Under Jackson LJ’s proposals, counsel appearing in the Chancery division, the TCC and Mercantile Court would need to devise a costs schedule for presentation to the courts and be subject to a costs management order.
The scheme was designed to focus on costs management across all cases. However, some feared that it would encourage forum shopping between the courts as litigants might favour the Commercial Court to void costs control.
Some suggest that the costs budgeting regime threatened to divide the improving relationship between the courts. The Jackson implementation committee was told that a level playing field was needed between the courts.
Hence it was decided that the obligations on the Chancery division, the TCC and the Mercantile Courts should be lifted.
While there will be no formal rules, the costs regime will remain at the forefront of judicial thinking on case management.