The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Merger talks between New York's Pennie & Edmonds and the West Coast's Cooley Godward have collapsed after the two firms came to blows over accounting differences
Talks between the two firms were already beginning to unravel two weeks ago because of integration issues after a group of heavyweight partners at Pennie's New York office spoke out about a tie-up. It is understood that both firms refused to compromise over the treatment of accounts receivable. At Pennie, partners who have left the firm are entitled to income from work they completed towards the end of their time at the practice. This means that income is deferred over a period, which the retired partner will then receive anytime between two to five years. The accounts receivable is used to fund the running of the firm because Pennie's capital pool - the partners initial equity investment - is relatively small. The system is at odds with the one at Cooley, and it is understood that the firm was worried that Pennie's treatment of accounts receivable would leave the merged firm liable to pay out large amounts of money to former partners. As a remedy, it is believed that Cooley asked Pennie to contribute all of its earnings to the merged firm over a number of months and to pay its own partners and fund the Pennie practice out of its own deferred accounts receivable. But the condition was vetoed by Pennie partners, causing the already fragile talks to founder.