The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Law Society president Peter Williamson has given the strongest indication yet that the conflicts rules will be clarified in favour of City practice, subject to Law Society Council approval at the end of next month.
At a risk management conference organised by insurer The St Paul last week, Williamson said: “Solicitors will be able to act with consent in specified circumstances where minor conflict exists between two or more clients, and firms will also be able to act for two or more clients who are bidding for the same outcome, such as in a private auction.”
The new rules come after years of consultation by the society, and will be less restrictive than the current regime.
Using points of law such as those defined in Prince Jefri, the guidance should enable large City firms to act for two parties in cases where they might previously have fallen between the gaps of the rules.
The use of Chinese walls will also be codified, according to Williamson. He commented: “A separate rule… will permit information barriers in certain circumstances. That the client has consented must be incontrovertible.”