The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
BAR Council chairman Peter Goldsmith QC has spoken out against common training for barristers and solicitors.
Addressing a conference on training he said there was only scope for a "small overlap" in training for the two branches of the legal profession.
He said if anything more than a relatively short common course was tried, skills training for barristers would be diluted as "the large group of solicitor trainees would, by virtue of its numerical supremacy, give the centre of gravity to the focus of the course".
Goldsmith's comments at the 'Prospects for common training' conference in Oxford appear at odds with the March consultation paper on ending the Bar School's training monopoly. The paper produced by a validation steering committee which Goldsmith co-chaired said the future of separate courses may be limited in the face of "increasing demand for common training".
But in his speech Goldsmith rejected as too expensive suggestions that potential barristers should take the same course as solicitors, followed by a separate Bar course.
He said: "A better way to proceed is on the validation route that we propose in our consultation paper. That will permit institutions who are also offering the legal practice course to suggest that they can meet parts of the Bar's objectives by a modular approach."