The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) believes it can win more cases by employing more investigators; its merger with the City of London Police was partly to do just that, for instance. But take the Swepstone Walsh-related case. The SFO spent four years gathering evidence. It did a great job: the trial judge said the SFO’s case was “scrupulously investigated”. Then it brought in a convicted fraudster, John Thomson, as its key witness.
Unsurprisingly, the court agreed with a defendant’s lead counsel that he was not credible. Thus the SFO’s case was blown out of the water. It seems what was needed was sound administration, particularly from the legal end.
In Tower Risk Management, the investigators once again probably did a grand job, but its case fell foul of legal technicalities. A case, perhaps, of needing better judgement calls, not necessarily armies of investigators.