Collyer Bristow defeats Bob Crow libel claim for Boris By Sam Chadderton 16 July 2012 18:12 17 December 2015 12:44 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Ben 17 July 2012 at 10:09 According to the papers filed, the poster suggested that “Bob Crow would cause grave harm to the interests of Londoners and supported a culture of political immorality”. I would have thought a defence of justification would have worked if the judge hearing the case had taken the Underground in the last 10 years. Reply Link Tory Boy 17 July 2012 at 18:33 It would have been a better day for democracy had Crow been forced to meet the costs from his own pocket. Reply Link Graham 18 July 2012 at 04:06 How come the RMT are siad to be picking up the costs ? A personal action surely. Would he have given the damages to the RMT if he had won ? I rather think not. Reply Link Muhammad Haque 19 July 2012 at 10:42 The “judge” is on the Right course & will be recognised soon for proving the view that the judiciary in England is not fit for just outcomes! Far less for justice. The bias against democratic representation as displayed by your web site so far is additionally typical of the calamity that the English court system and its allied marketeer outfits[!!!!] have become. It is only a matter of time before this scandal hits the public in the face, as the bankers have done. The Judge was biased and failed to show any regard for constitutionality with the framework of due process as universally understood. The vaunted sanctity of the common law has been once again reduced to abuse of power by a judiciary that mistakes its authority for a licence to render the law to the lowest common denominator. The “judge” has confused the statutes ad misinterpreted the ECHR. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.