Manchester firm Cobbetts is set to enter administration and is looking for buyers after filing a notice to appoint administrators on Monday.

Michael Shaw
The firm, which has 242 lawyers and more than 551 staff, informed its employees of the news this morning, according to The Business Desk, which broke the news.
In a statement, a spokesperson for the firm said: “Having regard to the difficult trading conditions in the professional services sector we’ve reluctantly concluded that the appropriate course at this time is for the firm to obtain the protection of an interim statutory moratorium to enable a sale of the business and assets of the firm to be concluded in a short time frame.
“We’re also working closely with our regulator, the SRA, with all stakeholders and our professional advisers to achieve the best outcome for creditors, clients, employees and members. We remain confident that we’ll be able to provide a further positive update in the very near future.”
Cobbetts turnover was £45.4m in 2011/12, up from £44.5 in 2010/11, while average profit per equity partner was £323,000. In May 2012, the firm elected litigation head Nick Carr to replace Michael Shaw as managing partner. Shaw had been in the role for 16 years.
The firm had also come close to merging with DWF, but talks broke down in January 2012 with both parties citing uncertain market conditions (31 January 2012).
In December 2012, the firm released its figures for the six months to November 2012, when it said that turnover was more than £20m, in line with the previous year.
At the time, Carr said in a statement: “We’re pleased with our results, operating in what continues to be a challenging economic environment. As forecast, there’s been no real growth in the UK legal market over the last six months. Considering the prevailing market conditions, we set and met a prudent but still challenging budget, forecasting fee generation in line with the market and seeking to align expenditure to anticipated income.
“Our half-year results ensure we remain on target, and new client wins mean that trading predictions for the next six months are strong. We expect to meet our financial targets by year-end.”
Cobbetts is the first major UK law firm to file for administration since fellow Manchester firm Halliwells collapsed in 2010 (25 June 2010). In March 2012 another, smaller Manchester firm, Donns, filed for administration with Irwin Mitchell among the number to pick up its work in progress (23 March 2012).
Cobbetts’ LLP accounts for the 2010/11 financial year, filed last January, show that the firm refinanced with its lenders, Lloyds Banking Group, during the year and had a total of £7.5m in loans in addition to a £2.5m overdraft facility, all due for renewal on 29 June 2012. The facilities comprised a £1m revolving loan, a three-year £3.25m revolving loan and a three-year £3.25m term loan.
At the time the accounts were filed, the firm had not sought written commitments from the bank that the overdraft facility would be renewed. It had, however, held discussions with lenders about its future borrowing needs and had received no information suggesting that the loans could not be renewed under “acceptable” terms, the accounts state. The accounts were drawn up on a going-concern basis despite this.
The 2010/11 LLPs also revealed a £400,000 payout for the firm’s top earner, a 37 per cent increase on £292,500 for the recipient of the biggest profit share in 2009/10.
Cobbetts’ next LLP accounts were due tomorrow (31 January), nine calendar months after the firm’s 30 April year-end.
On 22 January the firm filed a document at Companies House detailing a change in its agreement with Lloyds, signed off by Leeds law firm Walker Morris. It reveals a debenture securing lender Lloyds TSB against all outstanding and future debts, filed just eight days before the firm announced it would appoint administrators.
The filing also gave the bank the power to appoint an “administrator and/or receiver”.
For details on the firm’s path to administration, click here.
Readers' comments (70)
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 2:21 pm
Anyone have the suspicion that this is exactly what DWF want...to get the best bits out of admin from Cobbetts at a snip and leaving all the creditor behind with a haircut. One wonders how many domino's DWF can eat before it falls over and implodes....
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 2:27 pm
So is there any point in my completing my application? What if a buyer is found?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Patrick Stevens | 30-Jan-2013 2:29 pm
I was very sorry to read this. I'd had a few commercial property transactions on with them over the years, and always found them very good to deal with. It's sad when the solid firms go.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 2:32 pm
I wonder if HMRC are going to get paid tomorrow? Any partners with a tax reserve (used no doubt by Cobbetts for working capital) can always file their tax return on a net (cash received) basis if not.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
PC Plod | 30-Jan-2013 3:03 pm
Another firm of wideboy Mancs bites the dust.
Amazing The Lawyer hasnt spotted that the firm has filed today and is supposed to pay the partners' tax bills tomorrow - a connection in there maybe??
I wonder if Mike Shaw has already been repaid his capital...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 3:06 pm
Cash crisis - looming tax liability innit. Somebody in charge of finance has prob messed up.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 3:33 pm
Awful news for all the staff involved. The 50-75 market is so tight at the moment. There's almost no profit and lots of these firms bought fancy offices in the good times.
Suspect that Bond Dickinson will take the majority of the Cobbetts staff. They seem to be most similar law firm hiring and opening big new offices at the moment.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 3:55 pm
Ratio of 2.5 support to 1 lawyer seems unreasonably high. Suspect a buyer will make a deal to buy the lawyers and shed the support - something any tupe arrangement might have restricted.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 4:00 pm
So much for them being 'futureproof'
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Jan-2013 4:16 pm
So, who is going to be next? Roll up for the runners and riders.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment