Cobbetts and DWF abandon merger talks in uncertain market
Share
DWF and Cobbetts have called off merger discussions, blaming “uncertain market conditions”.
In a joint statement, the firms said: “The preliminary discussions between DWF and Cobbetts regarding a potential merger have now come to a conclusion and we have made the decision not to progress these talks any further due to the current uncertainty in market conditions.
“Growth by merger and lateral hires continues to be an option for both firms but until any discussions are brought to a conclusion, we will not be in a position to talk about them publicly.”
The two firms confirmed that they were in merger talks in January (18 January 2012), though The Lawyer reported that not everybody was said to be on board with the move – including Cobbetts’ managing partner Michael Shaw (16 January 2012).
The combination would have created a firm with around £132m in turnover and 1,798 staff.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page
Readers' comments (22)
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 12:21 pm
That statement doesn't make sense. The first paragraph says "The preliminary discussions....have now come to a conclusion". The second says "...but until any discussions are brought to a conclusion, we will not be in a position to talk about them publicly.”
Have talks concluded or not? Or are they just buying time until they get the support they need?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 12:31 pm
The explanation of "uncertain market conditions" is almost as unconvincing as blaming an "overzealous" techie for buying the domain name in November.
Whilst I have no ideal whether the merger was a good idea, taking so long to execute (compare with McGrigors/Pinsent Mason) was always asking for trouble. Cobbetts will have to pick-up the pieces as their talent is now in play.
DWF's dash for growth (being Top 30 is not a tribute to Jimmy Saville) I think is driven by Andrew Leaitherland's appetite to float/be bought-out. Yesterday's RJW announcement shows the money is gravitating to commodity legal services which can be provided by a pliable workforce and not by high-maintenance middle-aged partners. DWF's insurance practice has plenty of the former whilst Cobbetts has a surplus of the latter.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 12:43 pm
Word on the street is that DWF have massive holes in their finances which meant the merger could not move forward.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 12:46 pm
Who's Shaw calling out by LBW?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 1:28 pm
Conclusive proof - if it were needed - that turkeys do not vote for Christmas. Whilst I suspect there are some at dwf shaking their heads ruefully at an opportunity missed, there will be as many looking at news of Cobbetts' £10M worth of bank debt and heaving a sigh of relief. Few at Cobbetts will be saddened by this news. - I think dwf and all they stand for is complete anethema for many at Cobbetts.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 1:40 pm
I have worked at Cobbetts. Cobbetts are a very worthy outfit with some very committed staff. They will move on and do ok.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mancs Cat | 31-Jan-2012 1:43 pm
You can just imagine the guy in the photo asking:
'Are you a blue or a red'?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 1:50 pm
@12:43 - yes I'd heard that too.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 2:11 pm
DWF's appetite for growth is a bit over done, almost "alla halliwellls", just because you can put together a mass of people to make £132m a year doesnt imply the firm is going to be improving profit margins or giving better advice.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 31-Jan-2012 3:31 pm
Think it is also worth pointing out that DWF approached Cobbetts. Think there has been a lot of spin by DWF that the reverse is true. Suppose if you say something enough times you believe it will happen.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment