Categories:UK

Clifford Chance to cut 115 London support staff jobs

  • Print
  • Comments (13)

Readers' comments (13)

  • Slaughters

    Slaughters clearly aren't in the Magic Circle anymore....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • CC Redundancy Process

    CC would have saved a lot more costs a lot more quickly if they had taken the same approach as A&O. This protracted drawn out process means that they are still losing money and will have a big affect on morale. The biggest costs savings would have been removing those partners who really add nothing to the firm in terms of profitability. It just means in practice another financial year ahead where deadwood partners can draw a huge salary for just clinging on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • recycled copy

    The Lawyer's favourite phrase so far this year I think!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Magic Circle

    Can we please stop the discussion as to whether Slaughters are or are not in the Magic Circle! Not again ...!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Time to get rid of dead wood

    I worked at CC's for 4 years. There are lots of business services staff with not much to do and make up work for themselves to make them feel like they have a role there. The worst ones are the long servers of over 10 years plus who constantly boast how long they've been with the firm and as if the firm owes them a favour. This is a good opportunity for CC's to cut the dead wood.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with : Time to get rid of dead wood

    I couldn't agree more with ex cc employee. I was at the firm for 4 and half years. Worked extremely hard but harassed by my line manager constantly. This particular manager had been with the firm for 23 years! A bitter line manager who believed they could behave and treat staff in any manner they want and in complete breach of the harassment and bullying policy that CC has in place (which means nothing). The most bizarre thing is that Litigation Partners and HR litigation Managers do nothing about this. Hardly surprising that the firm is now having to make drastic costs. Anyway, the only positive that comes about from this approach is that Partners who condone such behaviour are now losing big money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • CC Business Suport Staff

    CC was the least dynamic environment I have ever worked in which surprised me given it is an international law firm. I noticed that some business support staff (the long timers) stroll in at 10am, take their time at lunch and start packing up at 5.25pm on the dot. The rest of the time is pushing a few files about and moaning constantly about their jobs and CC in general. It really has a negative affect on morale for those who join the firm. Not to mention the fact that they get paid for doing very little.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Business Support Staff

    To the usual stupid comments posted by lazy lawyers about how business support staff sit around and do nothing all day while they are all so busy....whatever. If you bothered to look outside your window you would see that the business support staff have been radically trimmed over the last two years. No-one can be carried because there aren't enough staff to cope with the work required. Check the leavers lists and you'll see so stop whining about how hard it is for you and get with reality.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Partners are lazy too

    Well I can't speak for CC but I agree that the attacks on support staff have gone too far. What about lazy partners? Like the firm in East Anglia where a Partner was running his own 'wine business' on the side and as a result couldn't supervise his juniors. Needless to say, when the proverbial hit the fan because of his inability to keep the eye on the ball a scapegoat was found and dispatched forthwith from the firm. The partner left or was kicked out some time later.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Time for talent to shine

    Being a support staff is certainly not one's choice. Most of the time is due to circumstance and the fact that there are no other options around at the time so they resort to this. I wonder if partners and lawyers can cope without the paper pushers. Not everyone can as lawyers have become so used to being molly-cuddled by their PAs and paralegals that without them, they would be paralysed and will not know where to look to find a simple document or how to use the photocopier or God forbid, staple a set of documents together.

    The main reason for cutting jobs in CC would be because there is not enough work in all the departments and the big firms like CC are inundated with support staff and this is the time when real talent can be identified. The support staff who really work hard and are intuitive would have seen this coming and probably approached lawyers in other teams like tax, regulatory, competition etc where there is work and would have made sure that they are working on important matters and are indispensable.

    The ones sitting around and doing manicures and making 10 cups of tea a day and gossiping about the latest fit lawyer on the scene or facebooking all day long will certainly be directed to the door. The ones who are kept on earned it and you have got to remember, support staff too have families to feed and commitments to meet, it is not just the lawyers who are earning £200,000 a year and driving jaguars and parading in their latest

    TM lewin suits who have commitments. A little sensitivity needs to be exercised towards those who make you you cups of coffee or answer your calls or type up your messy scribbles.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (13)