Clifford Chance chief berates staff for taxi abuse

  • Print
  • Comments (14)

Readers' comments (14)

  • taxi abuse

    Serves them right for moving to such a stupid location.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • taxis

    £60 max? staff working out in the sticks should presumably leave the office earlier.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Clifford Chance

    They appear to be struggling. Will they be the first to shed associates?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • taxi abuse

    cutting employees perks for working late, fantastic way to keep motivation high

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Taxi abuse

    I don't think messages like this can be very good for staff morale. I mean the policy itself seems pretty mean (at a couple of firms I know its 8pm in Winter - it gets dark by this time, and 9pm in summer) MC Firms ask a big commitment from their staff in terms of time (when I last read my contract it said my hours were 9 to 5.30 - fat chance!) and whilst clamping down on abuse is understood they should bear in mind how safe (or unsafe) it is to travel to even the most affluent parts of London (highlighted by the murder of Tom Rhys Pryce) and agree that their location is not the most convenient.
    Aren't most cabs chargeable to a client anyways?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Taxi cost cover ratio

    A thought - what is the "Taxi cost to charge out rate for even the most junior of associates at CC "??? I would be extremely surprised if even in the slowest of economic climates CC can't "afford" to send associates working late home in a taxi...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • cost of taxi

    and we though such restrictions were imposed only in India!! Perhaps it is time to encourage 'working from home' policy .... having said that will it work for lawyers?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excess is in no-one's interests

    I think some of the comments are a little unfair and naive. The Lawyer may be surprised to learn that it is not uncommon behaviour for lawyers to loiter for half an hour or so after finishing work to be able to take a taxi home at 9pm or to go for dinner out of the office and then come back and send an email to justify a taxi home. Most lawyers will know someone who has done this, whichever city firm they work for. Most taxis these days are not actually billed to clients, the expense is absorbed by the firm. I am not in anyway advocating removing the taxi benefit, I do not view it as a perk but as necessary for personal safety if leaving work late at night.
    However, in the current climate 'excess' is not in anyone's interests, obviously not the partners as they don't want to see PEP (or whatever the current measure is) decrease and associates shouldn't want this either as cutting excessive taxi costs is surely preferable to cutting associates or other office support.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Go home already!

    One has to wonder why so many people are staying late if there is no work for them to do. Perhaps Sandelson's comments would have had been more popular if he had framed them in terms of encouraging staff to strike a sensible balance between work and life and get into the habit of going home at a reasonable time, subject to individual work requirements?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • latest from CC

    The story continues - here is an extract from an e-mail sent by IT operations to everyone at CC today explaining the process for printer
    upgrades: "...
    As part of the business' environmental campaign, over the coming weeks all MFDs will be set to double sided output and the colour devices to B&W as defaults. Both single sided and colour printing/copying options remain available when required, but must be selected from the menus. This will reduce our carbon footprint and be more cost effective, with the aim to lower our paper usage and ensure only essential documents are produced in colour... " Good policy in fairness but if one puts 2 and 2 together... What next?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (14)