The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Claimant media lawyers are threatening to bring judicial review proceedings against the Government after it unveiled proposals to introduce a 10 per cent cap on conditional fee arrangements in defamation cases.
More than 10 firms, including Collyer Bristow and Russell Jones & Walker (RJW), have come together to establish the ‘Lawyers for Media Standards’ (LMS) group.
Its mission, said RJW head of media, libel and privacy Sarah Webb, was to add balance to the ongoing debate on legal costs in defamation cases.
“[Defendant] media lawyers acting as a group have had much greater access to Jack Straw than we have,” said Webb. “There’s clearly an advantage to having a cohesive approach.”
The claimant group has raised concerns that the working party created by Straw to examine the proposals is dominated by defendant newspaper editors and lawyers. This includes director of editorial legal services at The Guardian Gill Phillips and The Sunday Times editor John Witherow.
Of the 17-strong group only two are believed to be practising claimant lawyers - Schillings partner Rod Christie-Miller and Carter Ruck partner Andrew Stephensen.
Collyer Bristow head of reputation manage-ment Steve Heffer said the Government proposals appeared to be “one-sided”.