Childs: percentage of female partners at CC is ‘not good enough’
28 September 2009 | By Julia Berris
Related Articles
Female associates see partner-level promotions increase – marginally
11 May 2009
Suffragette city
20 March 2006
Female career progress on Clifford Chance agenda
8 September 2008
A fifth of female lawyers choose kids over careers
8 February 2010
Female partners defy glass ceiling in record numbers
8 September 2008
Clifford Chance is pledging to increase its percentage of female partners to 30 per cent.
The firm has a long way to go. As just 15 per cent of its partnership is female, driving this change at the magic circle firm is a hefty challenge.
Clifford Chance managing partner David Childs admits that it will not be easy.
“None of us are happy about the figure being around 15 per cent,” says Childs. “Speaking to junior female lawyers, it’s not good enough to say there’s just 15 per cent of the partnership female without making it clear that we want that to change. We wanted to give ourselves a goal to be able to make headway.”
However, although the magic circle firm announced its new goal in its 2009 corporate responsibility review, the actual details of how the firm intends to attain 30 per cent are still being thrashed out.
Childs says the firm is considering a range of options, including reviewing its partnership agreement to incorporate more flexible working opportunities.
“There’s no one thing that will solve the problem,” says Childs. “There’s no quick fix. It’s a long-term goal that we’re very focused on. It’s something that all firms face and there are many ways you can approach it.”
Aggressively pursuing a dramatic increase in female partners is problematic, Childs argues. Firms need to find creative ways to change their cultures and encourage females to strive for partnership.
“There’s a real concern around positive discrimination,” he says. “Women don’t want to be promoted on that basis. We need to find ways to change things over time. It’s a gradual process.”
While Clifford Chance and its magic circle competitors see encouraging women to the partnership as important to their futures, not everyone agrees.
“The main question I’d ask is, how and why are firms doing this?” says Dawn Dixon, a partner at Webster Dixon and a former member of the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS). “Not every woman wants to be a partner. The reality is that many want to do their job, live their life and spend time with their family. Partnership is not the Holy Grail.”
However, others welcome the move. “This is a very valuable initiative,” says AWS chair Clare McConnell. “What’s important is support from top-level management. Change is only possible if it has full support from the wider firm.”
Earlier this year (11 May) The Lawyer reported that the level of female associates made up to partner this year in the top 30 UK firms had risen slightly, from 25 per cent of new partners in 2008 up to 27 per cent.
It is a small change, but it is a start. Of the 24 firms that made promotions, 13 promoted more female partners than in 2008.
Different firms are finding different ways to tackle the issue. As reported by The Lawyer (14 September), Allen & Overy (A&O) is piloting a career development scheme aimed at teaching associates to communicate with clients and colleagues. The programme, which has been devised for senior associates, is aimed specifically at women lawyers.
The pilot involves a number of workshops targeting different skills, including building client relationships and learning how to communicate ’powerfully’.
Clifford Chance has implemented a range of initiatives, including women’s networks and programmes, mentoring programmes, maternity coaching and flexible working policies. But the firm recognises that this is not enough.
“We need to look very carefully at where we can improve these programmes and initiatives,” says Childs. “We’re in the process of discussing exactly how we can do this.”
Of the five global regions Clifford Chance’s Central and Eastern European (CEE) network had the lowest percentage of female partners at 8.3 per cent for 2009. In 2008 6.7 per cent of the CEE partnership was female.
Asia had the highest percentage of female partners in 2009 at 25 per cent, which dropped slightly on the previous year’s figure of 28.7 per cent.
Of the magic circle, A&O saw the most dramatic rise in female partner promotions, up from four in 2008 to eight in 2009 out of a total of 20. By contrast, Linklaters dropped from five in 2008 down to just two in 2009.
Clifford Chance’s female and male partner statistics are a stark contrast to the statistics on lawyers.
More than half of the legal staff are women in each of the Americas, Asia and the Middle East regions, with the highest coming in at 54.7 per cent in Asia. The lowest is 44.1 per cent in the CEE.
“We all recognise that the number of women coming through the ranks is a problem,” says Childs. “It’s a problem for every firm.”


Readers' comments (3)
Anonymous | 30-Sep-2009 12:14 pm
I think the real issue is not just the percentage of female partners but the percentage of female equity partners. Otherwise we are just shifting the glass ceiling one level up.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Sep-2009 12:52 pm
If we are honest, there is a "lads culture" in most law firms, sadly reinforced by some of the female partners. That's the main issue that needs to be worked on. The HR departments are inundated with sexual harassment cases that are just being shelved. Once the envronment is healthier and more meritocratic, women will not have to leave the profession. Treat the causes, don't impose quotas, if your intention is to keep the best ...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Sep-2009 6:12 pm
I think partners are the one that need maternity coaching- i.e to realise what it involves, that it is not a holiday and that if you take more than 4 months it makes you a human being (and a better mother) not a better candidate for the track to partnership. The reality is that this initiative needs to have a serious and frank female input- and I suspect that neither are there enough at the top to do it and that the ones that are will not really have the guts to flag exactly how bad the situation is in law for women who want to be mothers and partners. Most women at big law firms will never admit that the situation is dire for them to the point of making a change- its easier and more lucrative for their career (and thus for their family finances) to shut up about it and just keep working. To harp on about the sisterhood when you are a lawyer and a mother is even more career suicide than having a baby and taking a humane amount of maternity leave in the first place.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment