CC’s fast-track LPC adds to two-tier fears
Clifford Chance has become the latest firm to launch a fast-track LPC in a move that has heightened student fears of creating a two-tier training system for aspiring lawyers.
The seven-month course, to be introduced in January 2012, will be provided by the College of Law (CoL), which already plans to roll out a similar offering for Linklaters from next year.
The trend towards only offering condensed courses to a select few students with City training contracts has outraged undergraduates.
University of Kent Law Society president Zainul Jussab said: “Just because you join a certain type of firm, why should you finish the LPC more quickly than everyone else?”
CoL’s arch-rival BPP Law School was the first provider to launch an accelerated course for the so-called ’City consortium’ of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Herbert Smith, Lovells, Norton Rose and Slaughter and May. BPP’s fast-track LPC welcomed its third cohort of students last month.
University College
London (UCL) careers secretary Shiva Riahi said: “In the perfect world we should all have the choice to study the LPC for seven months.”
View results 10 per page | 20 per page
Readers' comments (15)
Threadneedles | 20-Sep-2010 12:08 pm
So this now leaves A&O as the only magic circle firm that doesn't offer the accelerated LPC.
I wonder why and for how much longer they can resist the trend?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20-Sep-2010 1:03 pm
Why would anyone actually pay for the LPC in this day and age?
Without sponsorship one will not get a training contract.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20-Sep-2010 2:29 pm
I asked A&O about their view on accelerated LPCs, the response was that 'it's only four months difference'.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Mark Smith | 20-Sep-2010 4:40 pm
Certainly when I did the LPC (back in '95) there was scope for it to be condensed. The question is, if it is being condensed, what is the extra time being used for? Is it to give young lawyers additional training in other areas, or to give them more hands on experience, or is it simply to get them generating fees more quickly?
I think there is huge scope to revisit the legal training framework and use the time more effectively to create better lawyers, but to do so is going to require the support of the major firms.
If interested, I wrote about this here: http://intelligentchallenge.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/your-training-was-useless-%C2%A0discuss/
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20-Sep-2010 11:41 pm
I'm in my 3rd seat at a magic circle firm.
Take my advice and take the 12 months option. Arguably the best time of your life is the period where you have a job secured and a 7k grant yet at the same time you're still a student!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
LPC student at the College of Law | 21-Sep-2010 0:42 am
But why on earth would you want to squash the LPC like that?! Finish it in normal time like everyone else instead of completely killing yourself to get it done that little bit quicker... so that you can start killing yourself even more in your lovely new Magic Circle training contract... how very jealous all the one year LPC takers must feel!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Clare | 21-Sep-2010 10:12 am
“University of Kent Law Society president Zainul Jussab said: “Just because you join a certain type of firm, why should you finish the LPC more quickly than everyone else?””
University of kent lawsoc president needs to man up (and go to a better uni...)!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Coolio | 21-Sep-2010 10:46 am
WHAT IS WRONG WITH KENT UNI???
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 21-Sep-2010 2:09 pm
It surely isn't a matter of killing oneself to complete the LPC in 7 months, nor necessarily having to start work earlier.
When I did the LPC, frankly there wasn't 6 months worth of work in the syllabus, so 7 months still leaves plenty of time to be a student. And even when I did it, we started in Sept/Oct and were finished by May or so; hardly a drastic reduction in total time devoted now.
As for starting work, most firms (certainly the MC ones) offer a range of dates to start. So, if anything, the 7 month LPC offers an opportunity either to start work quicker (which would have suited me given I'd done my travelling and frankly wanted to start earning some money) or to have more, rather than less, time off before doing so.
On any view, spending 8 or 9 months to cover what needs to take far less time, is a waste of time, which could be better spent - it's up to you whether you spend it at work or on a beach.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
HP | 21-Sep-2010 5:22 pm
"What is wrong with Kent Uni?'
To answer your question, its a bit of a gangsters paradise....
Good luck with the TC though... Ill see you when you get there...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment