Kian Ganz
Clifford Chance ramps up Indian operation as clients squeeze low-end work
Clifford Chance and Eversheds are considering reducing low-end work normally undertaken by trainees and paralegals and farming it out to India.
Clifford ;Chance ;has embarked on a plan to ramp up its offshore paralegal capacity. This will see its Indian staff handle much of the work that is currently undertaken by London trainees and paralegals – including ;form ;395 submissions to register company ;charges, ;due ;diligence document review ;for litigation, preparing shell company ;conversions, cloning documents and certain low-level drafting.
The Indian service centre has ;access ;to ;Clifford Chance’s global document management and IT systems to aid the integration of the offshored paralegals into transactions.
The ;move ;seeks ;to improve the margins on low-end UK legal work, which has traditionally been used in the practical training of junior lawyers.
Although Clifford Chance already uses its India capability for business support staff, this is the first concrete indication that it will increase the amount of commoditised legal work being carried out offshore – something given more impetus by the impen-ding Legal Services Act.
Clifford Chance global managing partner David Childs denied that the move would affect trainee numbers in London, calling it the firm’s “principal recruitment source”.
Childs, however, said: “[It’s] likely paralegal numbers in London will now be flat or possibly fall a little as leavers are not replaced”.
Clifford Chance expects the use of the Gurgaon service centre just outside Delhi to save around £8m in costs annually once the initial infrastructure investment ;has ;been absorbed.
By 2009 Clifford Chance, which currently employs around 110 paralegals in London, wants to employ 20 paralegals and 300 business services staff in Gurgaon – equivalent to almost 10 per cent of its global business services staff.
The ;centre ;presently employs seven paralegals, with six more Indian law school graduates in training. They will have to relinquish their Indian law practising certificates owing to the restrictions on foreign firms practising local law.
Eversheds is considering a similar initiative. A spokesperson for the firm said: “We have been actively exploring the possibilities of offshoring at the request of some of our major clients, however, we would only contemplate going down this route when and if we were convinced that the quality of our product could be maintained.”
Readers' comments (24)
Anon. | 13-Aug-2008 3:17 pm
Am I missing something?
Am I missing something? Or do commercial lawyers not go into commercial law to become rich?
Some of the posters below make commercial law sound like some sort of honorary brotherhood like the Knights of the Round Table or the Jedi.
If commercial lawyers can make more money by doing something they will do it (provided it's legal), but if they don't think that it will make them more money, or will only provide short-term money at the cost of future money, then they won't.
It has always been that way, and outsourcing is no more or less 'greedy' than the motivation of commercial lawyers to go to work in the morning.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-Aug-2008 9:22 pm
Very strange
I cannot see why there is all this outrage and shock at CC's actions. Does anyone seriously think - as FTSE General Counsel claims! - that CC won't still have 'relationships' with their clients? Since when were paralegals an important part of client relationships? They aren't, of course, so the effect on client relations will be zero.
This should be a concern to clients only if there is a drop in the quality of the work. I seriously doubt this will be the case, but it is a legitimate concern, I suppose. Nothing else matters - why should it concern clients if law firms are run as businesses with an eye on profitability? This is how the clients themselves are run and it doesn't mean you have to compromise on quality.
All this talk of doom and death of the profession is so laughable it's not worth bothering with. If they were outsourcing trainees, that would be a different matter. But they're not.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 20-Aug-2008 2:57 pm
But they will
One of the points here is what this promises for the next step - trainees and associates. If you don't believe that could ever happen, you're in a dream land.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 15-Jul-2009 11:21 am
Seems that CC will show the world how the legal business is done in the 21st Century.
Excellent strategic move...and there is nothing to crib about.... they have reatained the high-end work for those in UK, so why even bother?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment