The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Lawyers are criticising clothing retailer C&A for its decision to offer a 20 per cent discount to German customers at the start of the January sales
German sources claim that lawyers advising the company, which now faces huge fines, should have foreseen that the offer would contravene German retail law. The week-long offer, which gave consumers paying by credit card a 20 per cent discount, fell foul of paragraph 7 of Germany's unfair competition law, which bans discounted sales outside well-defined periods. After a complaint by the Association for the Fight Against Unfair Competition, a Düsseldorf court ordered C&A to withdraw the scheme. However, C&A ignored the injunction and sought to appease the criticism by extending its offer to all customers. This prompted a second injunction, which again the company ignored. It now faces a fine of up to y250,000 (£154,200) for each separate breach. C&A was advised in-house but private practice lawyers say that it should have sought external advice before going ahead with the discount scheme. "It lost both cases and I don't think it's been advised well," said one Cologne-based lawyer. However, Allen & Overy competition partner Wolfgang Witz said that the courts were very strict and the action has brought consumer law to the forefront of debate. Free-market opposition, Free Democrats (FDP), has called for changes to the law. It is arguing that the judge's decision against C&A has resulted in higher prices for consumers and that this proves there is a problem with the law. It is calling for the abolition of paragraph 7 in the interest of consumer protection. But Witz said that there is a certain value to the provision. "Discounts allow the retailer to set higher prices. We shouldn't allow merchants to make customers believe they are receiving a discount when it's not real," he said.