CMS Cameron McKenna is looking to treble its Bristol headcount in a bid to compete with national firms for lower cost work.
The top 20 firm is also planning a move from its current Merchants House office in order to handle the increased capacity.
Camerons currently has around 50 lawyers based in the South West, but it is now looking to grow this number to as many as 150 over the next three to five years.
The bigger office is expected to handle much the same work as its City counterpart, with the move being described as a form of “in-house outsourcing”. The firm will not compete for local work in the city.
Senior partner Richard Price said: “We’re not doing this from Mumbai or wherever else, and it’s not about servicing the Bristol market.”
The firm’s head of real estate Edward Benzecry will become the first high-profile partner to head west when he stands down from his role and relocates in May.
Price added: “Edward going down sends a message to our partnership about what we want to do in Bristol. There are certain areas of our work we can do from there.”
Benzecry is expected to be replaced as real estate chief by Mark Heighton after eight years leading the team.
There has been speculation that Camerons would use either Bristol or Aberdeen to effectively outsource London work, but the Aberdeen office is now expected to remain the focus of its UK energy practice.
Price said: “Both Aberdeen and Bristol are important, but Aberdeen will grow organically.”
Readers' comments (5)
IHateBPP | 26-Feb-2010 5:24 pm
Makes sense, outsourcing without the inevitable drop in quality from outsourcing to India.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
IHateBPPtoo | 26-Feb-2010 6:48 pm
This does make sense.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
National Boy | 26-Feb-2010 10:46 pm
Makes sense, but will not the key be the maintenance of the brand in London. This is essentially the business model of the large national firms with a London office. The argument being London work out-sourced to Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham etc,etc. The issue for the nationals are that they hare not perceived as 'City' law firms. If CMS can maintain what profile it has in London - the model makes sense. Personally it seems a better model than some firms who are outsourcing work to South Africa or India
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
TrustmetheCOLisWORSE | 27-Feb-2010 6:56 pm
Agreed
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
brian allan | 4-Mar-2010 1:30 pm
Nice move! however there are firms currently using Bristol as an on-shore location but then offshoring to India. With regard to quality this really depends on who is used. Quality for us has been very high what with work being done by offshore attorneys with UK experience
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment