The law faculty at the University of Cambridge has topped the Guardian newspaper’s 2012 university league tables, knocking rival the University of Oxford into second place.
The other law departments in the Guardian’s top 10 were University College London (3rd), Queen Mary (4th), London School of Economics (5th), the School of African and Oriental Studies (6th), Durham (7th), Warwick (8th), Newcastle (9th) and King’s College London (10th).
Of all the top 10 departments the one based at Durham showed the greatest improvement, jumping from 22nd place to take the number seven spot.
Reading University’s law faculty was also a strong performer, moving up from 36th place to 17th.
Elsewhere, the law school at the University of Nottingham, which came 10th last year, had to settle for the number 12 spot. Exeter, meanwhile, plunged from 12th place to 20th.
Other universities that have made their way onto the radars of leading law firms this year in a diversity push have moved up the table, with Leicester, Sussex and Essex universities achieving 15th, 21st and 44th place, respectively, although Southampton university fell two rungs to 22nd position.
The worst performing law schools were those based at Leeds Metropolitan, London Metropolitan and Bolton universities, which ranked 93rd, 94th and 95th respectively.
Cambridge beat Oxford to take the top spot in the overall university rankings.
Readers' comments (15)
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 3:35 pm
Well done Warwick for staying in the top 10...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 3:36 pm
This league table has proven exactly what I thought of Exeter - it's full of posh students who aren't that bright.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
True (dark) Blue | 18-May-2011 4:30 pm
University league tables are all deeply, deeply flawed. This one at least gives undergrads some idea of how happy they might be at uni and provides useful information on staff-student ratios, but so much depends on the individual. Particularly at Oxbridge, where the quality of your tutor could make a massive difference to the quality of your education. And is it really news that going to Oxbridge, Durham, UCL or other top 10 unis is probably a better bet than choosing to study law at Bolton?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Social climber | 18-May-2011 4:35 pm
Good point re Exeter - would be curious to know where At Andrews features in the tables - it's a another favourite hunting ground for law firms proving that provided you'd got to look and accent you'll be sorted...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 4:47 pm
@ Anonymous | 18-May-2011 3:36 pm - Spot on re Exeter, they're usually pretty unpleasant as well.
This league table is pretty flawed in the very large weighting that it gives to the results of various student satisfaction surveys. Few would objectively put Queen Mary above LSE, which is far stronger in terms of research. However in broadly highlighting the strength of the 'Golden Triangle' the table is reflecting reality.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 4:48 pm
"would be curious to know where At Andrews features in the tables"
One problem. St Andrews doesn't do law.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 5:05 pm
Heaven forfend St Andrews students and graduates might actually be bright and capable people.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 18-May-2011 5:06 pm
I've come across useless lawyers who went to Oxford, and excellent ones who went to less trumpeted institutions.
This country is obsessed with celebrity and rankings .
I suppose they have to fill their newspaper with something..
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 19-May-2011 4:11 am
I don't see what everyone has against Queen Mary!!! As a department the school of law ranks consistently in the top ten of every league table, with good student satisfaction and research levels. Furthermore, it is probably one of the only uni's in the top ten who won't produce students who think they are god's gift to litigation. Something which some may wish to bear in mind if they wish to pursue a career in law.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 19-May-2011 8:15 am
Well, if there are poor lawyers that went to Oxford, and excellent ones who went to apparently worse universities, then obviously this means that the proposition that Oxford is a better university than (say) Bolton is entirely undermined!
And the fact that your great grandad smoked 20 a day his whole life and lived to 96 shows that there is no link between smoking a various life-threatening illnesses.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment