The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Scottish firm Burness has forced retail giant Zara to apologise for misusing the Harris Tweed trademark.
Earlier this year Zara’s internet trading arm ITX Fashion was selling a product on its website described, but not labelled as, a ‘Harris Tweed’ blazer.
The Harris Tweed Authority (HTA) instructed Burness’ head of contentious IP practice Colin Hulme to negotiate a settlement with ITX, which accepted that as the jackets had not been made from Harris Tweed, they had broken the law.
The fashion firm has made assurances that it will not happen again.
The HTA said it accepted that the incident was “not deliberate” but that it treated the use of its name without permission “with the utmost seriousness”.
It said: “Misuse of the Harris Tweed name risks diluting it and undermines the integrity of an iconic Scottish name.”
The Harris Tweed Act of 1993 ensures the name and symbol can only be used for fabric “handwoven by the islanders of Lewis, Harris, Uist and Barra in their homes, using pure virgin wool that has been dyed and spun in the Outer Hebrides”.