The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The £5m negligence claim brought by 34 dairy farmers against Burges Salmon is due to be heard next month
The farmers allege that Burges Salmon was negligent in not advising them of the risk of not making a timely claim against the National Farmers' Union (NFU) in connection with losses arising from EU milk quotas. It is alleged the farmers were denied full compensation because their claims were brought out of time due to the firm's advice.
It is also alleged that Burges Salmon was in a position of conflict between the farmers and the NFU, because at the time the firm was funded by the NFU to bring a test case against the EU.
A Burges Salmon spokesman told The Lawyer: "The matter is with our insurer's solicitors and is being defended strongly."
Dairy farmers sought compensation from the NFU after it advised them not to seek action against the EU (until a claim against the EU was settled), after the EU denied them full compensation for loss of production due to new restrictions on milk production.
Burges Salmon, having written earlier to some farmers alleging that the NFU's advice was bad, later said that any claims against the NFU would result in only small wins. It also advised the farmers to await the outcome of the test case against the EU (which the firm was funded to carry out).
Last month Burges Salmon argued in the Court of Appeal that Mr Justice Neuberger was wrong to find that, for the purposes of calculating damages, the farmers could rely on Mr Justice Evans-Lombe's 1999 judgment. Judge Evans-Lombe had ruled that 10 lead farmers would not be able to receive full compensation due to the late commencement of their case against the NFU.