Buncefield lawyers fear corners will be cut

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Readers' comments (2)

  • Developments

    Recently David Steel tried to remove some property owners’ right to representation because of case duplication.

    The argument was put forward that if a party wishes to be represented it should have the right.

    David Steel took the pragmatic approach. He decided that they could stay in the proceedings on the basis that costs were at their own risk.

    That to me seems absolutely on the money. He tried to shorten the case but after listening to the evidence decided it wouldn't be in the interests of justice.

    That's as it should be. Justice is paramount.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • David Steel

    David has a level head on his shoulders and in this so far has proved himself to be a sensible judge.

    We need more judges like him at the bench. Forward-thinking but open to others ideas.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)