The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
Brown & Wood (now Sidley Austin Brown & Wood), top 50 US firm Jenkens & Gilchrist and Ernst & Young (E&Y) and its US-allied law firm McKee Nelson are being sued by 10 former clients for more than $1bn (£622.5m) for their advice on a tax scheme
The plaintiffs are alleging claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (Rico) of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligence, breach of contract constituting professional malpractice and conspiracy to breach fiduciary duty.
The claim asserts that E&Y, Jenkens & Gilchrist and Brown & Wood acted in concert to promote an unlawful and unregistered tax shelter.
The defendants “abused their position of trust by collecting millions of dollars of fees for putting into effect a scheme to reduce the individual plaintiffs’ income taxes that all of those defendants knew, or should have known, was a sham,” the claim states. “Indeed, both Jenkens & Gilchrist and Brown & Wood provided the individual plaintiffs with lengthy and detailed opinion letters confirming the propriety of the scheme.”
The claim also alleges that the $2.037m (£1.27m) fee charged by Jenkens & Gilchrist and the $75,000 (£467,000) fee charged by Sidley Austin Brown & Wood were unethically excessive, irrespective of the quality of the advice offered.
McKee Nelson and E&Y, according to the claim, also breached fiduciary duty by then revealing the details of their clients using the scheme to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Acting on behalf of the plaintiffs, Manhattan lawyer Blair Fensterstock of Fensterstock & Partners said this suit might lead to further such cases in the US. “I’ve been contacted by people all over the country since the claim was filed,” he said.
An E&Y statement said: “We believe that the allegations are frivolous, and we intend to defend ourselves vigorously.”