- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (16)
- Employment (10)
- Company/Commercial (9)
- Intellectual Property (8)
- Competition/EU (6)
- Corporate (6)
- Regulatory and compliance (5)
- Information Technology (4)
- Pharma/Biotech (4)
- Banking / Finance (3)
- Funds (3)
- Crime (2)
- Family (2)
- Insolvency & restructuring (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Tax (2)
- Business Tax (1)
- Commodities (1)
- Energy (1)
- Financial services (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Licensing/Gaming/Betting (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
A recent decision may result in a potentially more expansive basis for establishing jurisdiction over defendants in Europe.
Where monies are improperly paid out of a company, they may be traced through various accounts to the end recipient, even if each stage in the laundering cannot be identified.
The court’s interpretation of ‘unfair harm’ in the context of paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 of Insolvency Act 1986 has recently been considered by the High Court.
The French Competition Authority has accepted commitments from Nespresso in relation to alleged exclusionary practices concerning its coffee machines and capsules.
There are a few developments in this year’s Budget that are of particular interest for those operating in the life sciences sector.
On 21 March 2014, the European Commission adopted a revised technology transfer block exemption regulation and accompanying guidelines.
On 2 April 2014, the European Parliament voted in favour of the implementation of a new Clinical Trials Regulation.
Italy’s highest administrative court has ruled that Pfizer’s use of patents and SPCs relating to Xalatan/latanoprost in Italy constituted an abuse of its dominant position.
It is fascinating to see competition law used as a tool to encourage innovation in the traditional collecting society business model.
Court of Appeal stays appeal proceedings pending outcome of central amendment applications to the EPO
The Court of Appeal granted Samsung an application to adjourn an appeal from the High Court’s decision that two of Samsung’s patents were invalid.
Dare to share? Proposed new directive should help protect your confidential information when doing business in Europe
The European Commission’s new directive should help businesses to stop others from obtaining, disclosing or using their trade secrets in the EU without their permission.
The Preparatory Committee has accepted that its ambitious timetable for delivering the Unitary Patent Court and unitary patent system by ‘early 2015’ could not be met.
A recent US case could have been designed to tick as many ‘topical’ boxes as possible, ranging over the financial sector, big data and the possibly anti-competitive use of technology.
Following on from the Roma-branded Mobility Scooters case earlier this year, the OFT has announced a second decision on mobility scooters.
Up Close and Personnel — March 2014: admissibility of covert recordings made at disciplinary and grievance hearings
The EAT upheld the decision that covert recordings made by an employee of private conversations of the panels at her grievance and disciplinary hearings were admissible in evidence.
Up Close and Personnel — March 2014: dismissal for absence due to post-natal depression was not discriminatory
In Lyons v DWP Jobcentre Plus, the EAT upheld the decision of the Employment Tribunal.
Up Close and Personnel — March 2014: does the Equality Act 2010 cover post-employment victimisation?
In Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd, the Court of Appeal overturned the EAT and held that post-employment victimisation is prohibited by the Equality Act 2010.
The next year will see a series of significant changes to employment law. This article outlines the major changes and the dates when they will come into effect.
The Ministry of Justice has published Employment Tribunal statistics for the period October to December 2013.
Up Close and Personnel — March 2014: EAT allows an employee who successfully appeals to recover his fees from the employer
In Portnykh v Nomura International Ltd, the appellant employee asked the EAT to order the respondent employer to repay his fees.