Briefs
15 September 1998
Related Articles
A hard head and a warm heart
17 September 1996
The ones to watch
13 September 1999
The client's counsel
15 September 1998
The best of the up-and-coming
17 September 1996
Silks who smooth the way
16 September 1997
The Lawyer kicks off its annual review of the family Bar by revealing the dream teams chosen by solicitors
Paul Coleridge QC with Tim Amos
Paul Coleridge QC - Queen Elizabeth Building (Ian Karsten QC)
Called to the Bar: 1968
Appointed QC: 1993 (made Recorder in 1995)
Professional achievements/associations: Member of the Family Law Bar Association (secretary 1992-94)
Practice areas: Predominantly matrimonial finance involving disputes between wealthy spouses as well as child disputes involving both public and private law
Recent cases: Not disclosed
What they say about him: "Applies a broader brush [than Singleton] and can be very effective when talking about millions of pounds. He presents such cases very well and is an easy advocate to listen to."
Tim Amos - Queen Elizabeth Building (Ian Karsten QC)
Called to the Bar: 1987
Professional achievements/associations: Fluent in German with German Court experience. Articles include Financial Injunctive Relief under the 1989 Act [1994] Fam Law 445. Member of Family Law Bar Association and British German Jurists Association
Practice areas: Principally family finance, Anglo-German cases and those with a foreign or international element
Recent cases: Not disclosed
What they say about them as a team: "They complement each other very well, they blend well. Coleridge has experience, courage, very good judgement and is very good with clients whereas Amos is very dynamic, thorough and good at drafting."
Judith Parker QC with Nicholas Francis
Judith Parker QC - 1 King's Bench Walk
Called to the Bar: 1973
Appointed QC: 1991
Professional achievements/associations: Member of SE Circuit; Family Law Bar Association; International Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers; Chairman of Inter-Country Adoption Lawyers Association
Practice areas: All aspects of family law, including medico-legal issues, child care and adoption, divorce and matrimonial finance, international aspects of family law (including inter-country adoption and child abduction), and appellate advocacy
Recent Cases: Not disclosed
What they say about her: "She has a voice like Glenda Jackson," says one female solicitor. "She comes across as very persuasive and very concerned." "She is very nice to deal with from a solicitor's point of view."
Nicholas Francis - 29 Bedford Row (Peter Ralls QC)
Called to the Bar: 1981
Professional achievements/associations: Member of the Family Law Bar Association (committee member); Bar Council Professional Conduct Committee; Bar Council Legal Aid and Fees Committee
Practice areas: Principally matrimonial finance with a particular interest in pension issues and foreign asset cases but also recommended for child related matters
Recent Cases: Re P (A Minor) [1992] (Education); C v C [1994] (wasted costs order); S v S [1995]
What they say about him: "A creative thinker who inspires great confidence and has a very, very sound practice."
Barry Singleton QC with Lewis Marks
Barry Singleton QC - 1 King's Bench Walk (James Townend QC)
Called to the Bar: 1968
Appointed QC: 1989
Professional achievements/associations: SE Circuit; Family Law Bar Association
Practice areas: Predominantly matrimonial finance
Recent Cases: F v F (Duxbury Calculation: Rate of Return) [1996]; Dart [1996]; Phillips v Peace [1996]
What they say about him: "Very capable of creative lateral thought as well as detailed analysis."
Lewis Marks - Queen Elizabeth Building (Ian Karsten QC)
Called to the Bar: 1984
Professional achievements/associations: Family Law Bar
Association
Practice areas: Matrimonial finance
Recent Cases: F v F (Ancillary Relief: Substantial Assets) [1995]; Dart v Dart [1996]; H v H (Child Abduction: Acquiescence) [1996]
What they say about him: "Very incisive." "Understands a big money case and knows how to compromise or to win them."
What they say about them as a team: "Would use them for a complex big money case, since you can only justify trebling the cost in those cases where there is some level of complexity."

