Zero-hours contracts — Wojtazewski v BOA Ltd
The Jersey Employment Tribunal (JET) has recently struck out a claim for redundancy and payment of notice brought by a worker contracted under a zero hours contract on the basis that he was not an ‘employee’ and was not therefore entitled to bring any claims under the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 (the Law).
The Applicant in Wojtazewski v BOA Ltd t/a Play.com was contracted to work as a warehouse assistant for the Respondent company, who operated an internet orders fulfilment business in Jersey for all clients who were able to benefit from the low value consignment relief on goods imported into the United Kingdom from the Channel Islands.
In addition to a small number of permanent employees, the Respondent maintained a ‘bank’ of workers who were contracted to work as and when the Respondent’s business needs so required. The Applicant was one such bank worker and was contracted to work as a warehouse assistant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
On 11 September the Guernsey Court of Appeal confirmed the test to be applied in determining whether a person should be added as a party to existing proceedings.
When a company is being wound up in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, should an anti-suit injunction be issued to prevent a creditor or member from pursuing proceedings in another jurisdiction?