Zero-hours contracts — what’s the controversy?
By Alison Downie
The current controversy over the issue of zero-hours contracts is focused on the fact that they leave workers with little stability or security, uncertain about earnings and vulnerable to exploitation by their employers.
While a generous interpretation of zero-hours contracts may describe the arrangement as one in which the worker is placed on an equal footing with their employer, and so is free to accept or refuse work when offered, in most zero-hours contracts the worker is in fact required to be available when or if called upon and to accept work when offered.
In practice, a significant percentage of workers engaged under zero-hours contracts work regular hours, for the same employer, but with limited access to employment rights, lower wages and no job security…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Goodman Derrick
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Supreme Court dismisses police appeal and refuses to allow secret evidence in application for production order against Sky News
R (on the application of British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis involves conflicting areas of public interest.
Opinion that employee not disabled under Equality Act does not give employer defence for not making reasonable adjustments
Employers have a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees. However, this duty only arises where the employer knows the employee is suffering from a qualifying disability.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories
Our latest in-depth analysis of UK M&A legal bills reveals a good performance by smaller firms and success fees on the rise