You need to prove your case: California Supreme Court confirms wage-and-hour defendants have right to argue individualised defence in class action trials
By Ben Gipson and Maria C Rodriguez
Class action trials have long been the bogeyman no one talks about in California. Parties had to address whether a class action was ‘manageable’ before it was certified, but because the vast majority of class actions never proceed to trial, no one really knew what the rules were to craft a trial plan for these types of representative actions.
On 30 May, the California Supreme Court in Duran v US Bank National Association confirmed that not only must a trial plan be addressed before a case can be certified as a class action, but the trial plan, and specifically the use of representative testimony and sampling of data, cannot be used to deprive wage-and-hour defendants of their right to question the appropriateness of this methodology when there are individualised questions presented.
This case has far-reaching ramifications. It has the potential to dramatically shape the way employment class actions proceed in California and how employers evaluate these cases going forward…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper’s privacy experts have compiled a list of dos and don’ts for addressing privacy compliance in M&A transactions.
On 22 July 2014, a new law amending the Law on Data Protection and Law on Information was signed off by the Russian president and thus was officially adopted.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions