Yong Jin: on the importance of back-to-back indemnities
The Commercial Court has dealt with the issue of whether a guarantee given by sub-charterers to the Master was given to and accepted by the Master in his capacity as a representative of the head owners or on behalf of the intermediate charterers.
The guarantee was intended as an indemnity against any damage caused by the vessel loading a cargo quantity on the basis of a maximum draft of 13.3m. The head owners brought a claim directly against the sub-charterers on the basis of an alleged grounding of the vessel.
The court held that the guarantee was given to and accepted by the Master on behalf of the intermediate charterers, not the head owners, with the result that the claim brought by the head owners failed. The judgment highlights the importance of obtaining any indemnities/guarantees on a back-to-back basis throughout the charterparty chain…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The Privy Council has confirmed that an injunction restraining a bank from paying under a letter of credit on the basis of fraud will only be justified in extraordinary circumstances.
Damages for breach of terms as to quality — does the Sale of Goods Act limit such damages to depreciation in value?
This sale contract dispute provides a useful refresher with regard to the proper application of the provisions of sections 53 and 54 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.