Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

UK 200 2013 position: 25

Wrongful winding-up petition and unreasonable refusal to mediate — the costs consequences

The court has reaffirmed the danger of using a winding-up petition as a means of debt collection where the underlying debt is disputed and of refusing to mediate.

In Lakehouse Contracts Ltd v UPR Services Ltd, there was a dispute between the parties over the value of scaffolding work invoiced to Lakehouse by UPR. Lakehouse set out details of why UPR’s valuation of the works was disputed and paid the sum it agreed was due. UPR issued a winding-up petition for the balance but gave an undertaking not to advertise the petition without giving 14 days’ notice. UPR also asked Lakehouse to mediate the disputed sum so as to avoid further costs being incurred. Lakehouse refused to do so unless the petition was withdrawn and its costs paid.

At the hearing of the petition, UPR agreed to it being struck out on the basis there would be a mediation of the underlying dispute. Lakehouse refused to mediate the costs of the petition…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.

Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

View more briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • Paul Wilson

    Regional: attempted merger

    Alliances, failed and successful, are the story of the year outside London

  • Belinda Bradberry

    Interior designs

    Polish up your retention policy - private practice lawyers are increasingly eyeing in-house roles

View more analysis from The Lawyer


2 Snowhill
B4 6WR

Turnover (£m): 120.50
No. of Lawyers: 458