Worldwide anti-corruption initiatives — a comparison of UK and US legislation
The UK’s Bribery Act (the Bribery Act), which came into force on 1 July 2011, was supplemented by guidance issued by the UK Ministry of Justice aimed at helping commercial organisations understand the types of procedures they could put into place to prevent bribery. Other guidance relating to the Bribery Act has also been published, such as the “Joint Prosecution Guidance” of the Director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Director of Public Prosecutions, the SFO’s recent revised guidance on the Act and Transparency International’s “Adequate Procedures Guide”.
By contrast, they key piece of long-standing anti-bribery legislation in the US has come with little official guidance until very recently. In November 2012, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a joint “Resource Guide to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” (the Guide). The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) was enacted as far back as 1977 and is aimed at combating the bribery of foreign officials. Unlike its predecessor, the much less detailed “Lay Person’s Guide to the FCPA”, this new Guide is intended to provide a comprehensive review of the US government’s position on enforcement under the FCPA and its expectations of corporate compliance procedures. Although it is not binding, the Guide will serve as a useful resource for companies faced with the challenge of complying with the FCPA.
This article provides a general comparison of the Bribery Act and the FCPA, in light of the new FCPA Resource Guide. It will be of relevance to corporates trading internationally, who may find they have to comply with both statutes…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
A carrier, whose containers had been detained for a long time and seemed to be unlikely to be returned, was found not to have the right to daily liquidated damages for an open-ended period.
The orthodox view is that damages are limited to losses suffered during the overrun period only. Similar issues were explored in a recent judgment from the Commercial Court in the Great Creation.