Work emails to spouses may not be protected by marital privilege
Yesterday in a criminal case, United States v Hamilton, 2012 WL 6000731, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that emails the defendant sent to his wife over his employer’s email system were properly admitted as evidence against him. At the time he sent the emails, his employer had no computer usage policy, but it subsequently adopted a policy providing that “users have no expectation of privacy in their use of the Computer System”. The court held that because the defendant failed to delete his old messages once he knew that policy was in effect, he waived his privacy rights and the messages could be used against him.
Click on the link above to download this Debevoise & Plimpton briefing.
News from Debevoise & Plimpton
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Debevoise & Plimpton
The Dodd-Frank Act amended section 4a of the CEA to require the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to establish position limits on an aggregate basis.
On 15 November 2013, the US Supreme Court agreed to consider two questions that have the potential to transform the landscape of private securities litigation.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers