Woolworths redundancy appeal referred to ECJ
By Alan Chalmers
The Court of Appeal has decided to make a reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the controversial Woolworths/Ethel Austin collective redundancy litigation.
In USDAW v Ethel Austin (in administration), the Ethel Austin and Woolworths chains of shops had gone into administration resulting in their employees being made redundant. The employees who were members of a trade union claimed protective awards for failure to consult collectively under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act (TULRCA), which provides that an employer is required to consult with appropriate representatives when proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees at one establishment within a 90-day period. At the employment tribunal, only those employees who were employed at premises where 20 people or more were employed succeeded in claiming protective awards. Those who worked at stores of fewer than 20 people failed in their claims. The union appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). The issue before the EAT was whether section 188 was to be interpreted so as to omit the words ‘at one establishment’ in order to give effect to the core objective of the EU directive on collective redundancies, allowing protective awards to be made to all employees whose employer dismissed 20 employees as redundant within 90 days. The EAT held that those words should be deleted. The consequence of this was that the secretary of state (and ultimately the taxpayer) was liable for the protective awards.
Not long before the EAT handed down judgment in Ethel Austin, a tribunal in Northern Ireland referred a similar case, Lyttle v Bluebird UK Bidco Ltd, to the ECJ. That case concerned redundancies arising out of the administration of the Bon Marche chain…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.