Woman’s best friend — removal of police dog from pregnant handler was direct discrimination
PC Keohane was a dog handler, handling two ‘narcotics’ dogs. Her status as a dual narcotics dog handler was important in that it enhanced her career prospects and gave her an opportunity to earn overtime. The Metropolitan Police operated a policy on the re-allocation or withdrawal of police dogs where handlers were likely to be non-operational for a while. For pregnancy or maternity leave, it specified that female officers would, in most cases, not be permitted to continue as operational dog handlers during their pregnancy, for health and safety reasons.
When PC Keohane told the Metropolitan Police that she was pregnant, a decision was taken to re-allocate Nunki Pippin, her ‘passive’ search dog, leaving her with a proactive search dog.
The Employment Tribunal found that the reason for the removal, and subsequently a failure to re-allocate the dog to her before the end of her maternity leave, was her pregnancy and maternity, and hence was directly discriminatory…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump