Winckworth Sherwood on marital property agreements ('pre-nups') — how the law has changed
Evidence of the cost and acrimony caused by divorce can be found on an almost daily basis in the UK media, laying bare the separation details of ‘celebrities’. Marital property agreements, or pre-nuptial agreements as they are more commonly known, are often discussed in such stories, leading many to believe ‘pre-nups’ are confined to only the rich and famous; they are not.
Following the widely publicised Supreme Court case of Radmacher v Granatino in 2010, pre-nups have gained strength in their ability to protect the assets of those entering into marriages or civil
partnerships. If entered into in a spirit of collaboration, they can reduce the acrimony and difficulty often experienced upon divorce and the subsequent division of assets.
A pre-nuptial or pre civil partnership agreement is is a contract entered into before a marriage. The written agreement sets out what the couple agree should happen in relation to finances and other matters, should the relationship break down in the future. An agreement may provide for the division of capital and property, and whether and how much maintenance will be paid by a former spouse to the other…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The EAT considered whether an employee who said she was too ill to resign for 18 months and who received 39 weeks’ sick pay during that period had affirmed her contract.
It is possible for employers to defend unfair dismissal claims arising from inappropriate use of social media even if the misconduct is not work-related.